What's new

Tom Thibodeau trade

infection

Well-Known Member
Staff member
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
Rumor has it LA is looking at him and speculations of offering compensation would be necessary. I'd imagine we could beat their offer. I'd be willing to go as high as the GSW pick and taking back Boozer (and sloanfeld).
 
LAC only gave up a 1st rounder for doc right? So it's not like the pick has to be that great... kind of just thinking out loud here...
 
Couldn't CHI just amnesty Boozer though?



I think it'll take more than the GSW pick this year to get it done. We might have to include that '16 GSW pick.
 
Couldn't CHI just amnesty Boozer though?



I think it'll take more than the GSW pick this year to get it done. We might have to include that '16 GSW pick.

They could amnesty Boozer, but he'll be picked up for pennies on the dollar and CHI will be left with a hefty check.
 
Rumor has it LA is looking at him and speculations of offering compensation would be necessary. I'd imagine we could beat their offer. I'd be willing to go as high as the GSW pick and taking back Boozer (and sloanfeld).

I honestly think you're onto something. And I'd sign off.
 
The Clippers gave up an unprotected 2015 pick which would likely end up being late in the 1st round. If the Jazz make a play for Tom Thibodeau, they should make the same offer, but a year later. Unprotected 2016 pick. Bulls do it because they hope the Jazz still suck two years from now and they get a great asset. Jazz do it because they expect their young core + 2014 lottery pick to be playoff bound two years from now. I'd keep my picks for this season and next, and I'd offer the 2016 pick instead of either 2017 picks. Too far out to know what they'll be worth. Golden State could be awful by then with their aging roster with injury question marks.
 
Why would Chicago do this? Why would Thibs want to do this? I dont understand where all this thinking is coming from.

As long as the Bulls have both Noah and Rose, Both Thibs and the Bulls probably will want to stay together.

I dont see Thibs going anywhere.



I didn't mean to like the post above mine.
 
Why would Chicago do this? Why would Thibs want to do this? I dont understand where all this thinking is coming from.

As long as the Bulls have both Noah and Rose, Both Thibs and the Bulls probably will want to stay together.

I dont see Thibs going anywhere.



I didn't mean to like the post above mine.

They just have Rose's salary and the team isn't going anywhere unless they can't shed both Rose's and Boozer's salary.
 
They just have Rose's salary and the team isn't going anywhere unless they can't shed both Rose's and Boozer's salary.

insufficient evidence lacks logic not convincing glass half empty

Having Rose and Noah is a very good thing still. Books arent that cooked. Rebuild is around the corner. Real truth. Glass half full
 
Back
Top