What's new

Offer to Cavs for #1 is to draft Wiggins not Parker

That's just the thing. If Wiggins becomes a legit #1 option, and top-10 or even top-5 player? That's chump change.

It's true, you do about anything to get your hands on a top 5-10 player in the league. The only way it goes wrong is if you pay all of that for someone that gets injured or turns into a bust... but that's the risk you have to take.
 
Sending assets for Harden is different than sending assets for a college player. I'd risk it for Wiggins, but not for Parker.
 
Sending assets for Harden is different than sending assets for a college player. I'd risk it for Wiggins, but not for Parker.

You're not wrong. But the principle still applies. You're not trading for the #1 pick in an exceptional draft while thinking "maybe this guy will be pretty good."
 
I bet the Rockets are sure bummed they sent all of them assets to OKC for Harden.

The Thunder were cheap. They didn't want to sacrifice Perkins (amnesty) and pay both Harden and Ibaka to end up over the tax line. If the Jazz had that lineup - Westbrook, Harden, Durant, Ibaka and the best center they can get. . . we'd be pissed at that trade.

It's apples to oranges. They didn't send a top 5 pick in a loaded draft, plus a high lottery player and other potential lottery picks. The Rockets flat out ripped them off.

Do the Jazz need a star? Absolutely. But don't be stupid about it. Make the best draft picks you can at every selection, then coach and develop your young talent into the best possible version of themselves. If you're doing your job right, you will hit on a star at some point.
 
Back
Top