Report: #5, Favors, Burks for Cavs' #1 pick

[Jazz4ever]

There is no ****ing way im trading Favors, Burks, and #5 for #1 and Jarrett Jack, thats insane.

There are some decent candidates to replace Burks this year at 23 though. Adams, Bogdon, McDaniels, Hairston, Wilcox. The draft is unusually strong in the SG department past the lottery. Burks will be better than most of these guys, but they aren't scrubs.

 

[mhindy]

I voted no. I would rather include a top 3 protected first next year than Burks.

 

[Fishsticks]

Ah, then we simply have differing definitions of overpay.

It is indeed a lot.

Kinda like a bottle in da club. Normally you would not pay a G for a bottle of goose cause that's just stupid. But damn that experience is first class.

I guess I hope wiggins gives us that taste of success we had for so many years. but yeah its overpay, because he can't do it himself and in fact we may regret giving up so much a few years down the line if we can't replace the parts we gave up.

 

[The Midnight]

I voted no. I would rather include a top 3 protected first next year than Burks.

wow .. so u would take Burks over the 4th pick next year????



This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk

 

[sgjazzfan]

I'd do Favors, Burks and an unprotected future first. Take Wiggins at #1 and Embiid at #5.

 

[Doublea]

I'd do Favors, Burks and an unprotected future first. Take Wiggins at #1 and Embiid at #5.

That is interesting. Maybe even add the #23 pick for good measure.

 

[mhindy]

wow .. so u would take Burks over the 4th pick next year????



This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk

Yes because keeping burks means that we won't be picking 4 next year.

 

[Fishsticks]

I'd do Favors, Burks and an unprotected future first. Take Wiggins at #1 and Embiid at #5.

well then....

 

[The Midnight]

Yes because keeping burks means that we won't be picking 4 next year.

yeah... but if 4th pick is better and cheaper???



This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk

 

[bjunior]

bad trade for jazz, favors + burks + 5th pick seems too much for my taste

but do the trade, blatt needs depth

 

[d@!!0n0rcutt]

Nay, unless the front office really thinks Wiggins is that good, then Yay for me.

 

[Zulu]

Yes because keeping burks means that we won't be picking 4 next year.

yup