PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
That's not my whole quote. The sympathy I'm speaking of is in not incarcerating people for being drug addicts. That's the extent of the sympathy I was asking for.
What about for their ancillary crimes...like theft?
That's not my whole quote. The sympathy I'm speaking of is in not incarcerating people for being drug addicts. That's the extent of the sympathy I was asking for.
What about for their ancillary crimes...like theft?
Yeah, theft should be legal...as long as you're a drug addict. Duh.
Yeah, theft should be legal...as long as you're a drug addict. Duh.
Yeah, theft should be legal...as long as you're a drug addict. Duh.
Sadly that is a platform you could probably get a solid number of people to rally for.
So, you're suggesting that if someone plays football and receives a scholarship and/or payment for doing so that he should be immune to personal problems or perhaps mental health issues?
What do you mean "those"? Don't you mean "us"?
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];900066 said:No it should not be legal but you cannot anger yourself over this thing because drug abusers advance science so end up with more. That what I said to make it clear.
All this from the guy who had a photo in his footer for years that identified everybody in Rice Eccles Stadium as "classless tools." Priceless.
Apparently none of those "classless tools" suffer from any sort of addiction. If they did, Trout would have been the perfect gentleman.
What do you mean "those"? Don't you mean "us"?
Good catch. I didn't mean to infer that I'm not a "classless tool" because I most certainly am.
Good catch. I didn't mean to infer that I'm not a "classless tool" because I most certainly am.