What's new
By:

Now paging DutchJazzer

I actually click the link. It would make the best spin doctors proud.
 
finally got the time to read it.
brah, very reputable source. but their numbers seem different then what i have seen.

seems like books are cooked. need to do more research ont hat.

for now very rpeutable source, so i gotta say OBAMA is teh BEST!!!111!!!! all hail emperor OBAMA
 
Obama has been spineless, and a typical corporate puppet like all presidents in this country for last 50-60 years or so, but we're all much better off with him in office than McCain/Palin or Romney/whoever else he had on that pathetic ticket.

I can't wait for 2016 when we - the USA citizens - have a new, fresh and inspiring batch of candidates to learn about and vote to lead us. Oh wait, we'll get two robots who have been in politics/government for 50 years and half the country will mindlessly vote for one while the other half mindlessly votes for the other.

Luckily I will be moved out of the country by then for work and hopefully never coming back to this mediocre hell hole.
 
HighlandHomie said:
Obama has been spineless, and a typical corporate puppet like all presidents in this country for last 50-60 years or so, but we're all much better off with him in office than McCain/Palin or Romney/whoever else he had on that pathetic ticket.

I can't wait for 2016 when we - the USA citizens - have a new, fresh and inspiring batch of candidates to learn about and vote to lead us. Oh wait, we'll get two robots who have been in politics/government for 50 years and half the country will mindlessly vote for one while the other half mindlessly votes for the other.

Luckily I will be moved out of the country by then for work and hopefully never coming back to this mediocre hell hole.
Click to expand...


romney is not spineless. he is more preapred for (international eg russia and isis) war then obama ever was.

so it contradicts what ur saying
 
HighlandHomie said:
we'll get two robots who have been in politics/government for 50 years and half the country will mindlessly vote for one while the other half mindlessly votes for the other.
Click to expand...
This
 
fishonjazz said:
This
Click to expand...

Why "this"? Don't you wonder why it's always the partisan hacks who blame Obama or Bush or Congress or Washington or Whatever who are the ones always bitching about 2 party politics? It's like the cheating wife who's always accusing her husband of the same to psychologically hide her own guilt.

Most these "I hate teh too pardy sistem" richard heads would never vote for a candidate of the other party. If you cannot do that then you are the problem, not the system.
 
franklin said:
Why "this"? Don't you wonder why it's always the partisan hacks who blame Obama or Bush or Congress or Washington or Whatever who are the ones always bitching about 2 party politics? It's like the cheating wife who's always accusing her husband of the same to psychologically hide her own guilt.

Most these "I hate teh too pardy sistem" richard heads would never vote for a candidate of the other party. If you cannot do that then you are the problem, not the system.
Click to expand...
I just like having me than two options on thing in general..... presidential candidates included.

It sure would suck if there were only 2 tv channels..... 2 restaurants for me to choose to eat at, etc etc
 
HighlandHomie said:
Obama has been spineless, and a typical corporate puppet like all presidents in this country for last 50-60 years or so, but we're all much better off with him in office than McCain/Palin or Romney/whoever else he had on that pathetic ticket.

I can't wait for 2016 when we - the USA citizens - have a new, fresh and inspiring batch of candidates to learn about and vote to lead us. Oh wait, we'll get two robots who have been in politics/government for 50 years and half the country will mindlessly vote for one while the other half mindlessly votes for the other.

Luckily I will be moved out of the country by then for work and hopefully never coming back to this mediocre hell hole.
Click to expand...

More specifically we will get Hilary Clinton vs Rand Paul*.

If Hilary runs I see no way she doesn't get her parties nomination this time around.

There really isn't a whole slew of republicans that can win the GOP either. Chris Christie would crash and burn in a Republican primary imo.

*Condoleezza Rice would be strong in both the primary and the general if she decided to run.
 
Ralph Nader is the only person that is considered on the left that I ever thought was the least bit intriguing. Although, I haven't actually voted in a presidential election yet.....
 
fishonjazz said:
I just like having me than two options on thing in general..... presidential candidates included.

It sure would suck if there were only 2 tv channels..... 2 restaurants for me to choose to eat at, etc etc
Click to expand...

I'm not saying anything about you personally fish, but this does raise an interesting topic. I remember reading once a study that was done that showed that increasing available choices actually tends to decrease people's satisfaction with the choices they make and lower overall happiness. I will have to see if I can find anything about that. It's pretty interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top