What's new

For stoked GAME THREAD!!

Can't say I don't agree with you ( me being an ******* and all), but saying fish was "acting" like a dumbass is not a personal attack. You should know this as you have turned personal attacks into a fine art.

but Cy doesn't attack anybody within the EYE. That's the difference, braugh.
 
I am not sure why there is a concern with Exum, his numbers are pretty close to all those around him considering the extra experience they have.
014-2015 Averages - Preseason
Player Team Pos GP Mins FGM FGA FG% 3PM 3PA 3P% FTM FTA FT% TOV PF ORB DRB RPG APG SPG BPG PPG
Elfrid Payton ORL PG 3 29.3 3.67 9.00 .407 0.33 1.33 .250 1.00 2.33 .429 3.67 2.00 0.67 3.67 4.33 5.67 1.33 0.33 8.67
Dante Exum UTA PG 3 24.1 2.00 5.33 .375 1.33 3.00 .444 1.00 1.33 .750 3.67 2.00 0.33 1.00 1.33 2.33 0.33 0.33 6.33
Zach Lavine MIN SG 2 23.5 4.00 10.00.400 1.00 2.00 .500 1.00 1.00 1.0003.50 1.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 0.50 0.00 10.00
Marcus Smart BOS PG 4 27.8 1.75 7.25 .241 1.00 5.25 .190 2.25 3.50 .643 3.00 2.25 0.25 2.25 2.50 5.00 2.00 0.25 6.75
Jabari Parker MIL SF 3 31.5 5.00 13.33.375 0.33 2.33 .143 1.67 2.67 .625 2.33 3.00 1.67 3.33 5.00 1.33 1.00 0.00 12.00
Nik Stauskas SAC SG 3 24.5 3.67 6.67 .550 1.33 3.00 .444 1.00 1.00 1.000 2.00 3.67 0.33 1.00 1.33 0.67 0.67 0.00 9.67
Julius Randle LAL PF 3 21.7 3.67 9.33 .393 0.00 0.33 .000 1.33 3.00 .444 2.00 4.00 1.33 5.67 7.00 1.00 0.00 0.33 8.67

Again, I don't think anyone is that concerned with Exum, we understand he is very inexperienced and young and will improve tremendously. It's just puzzling that he has gone away from what was reported to be one of his biggest offensive strengths and embraced what was reported to be his biggest offensive weakness, which is cool if that means he comes back next year way stronger and attacks the rim and has a 3pt shot.

I just want to see him try to get to the rim and finish though. Hard to get better at something if you don't practice it in the games.
 
There was nothing for Dante.

Yet im willing to bet that alot of us made projections about what type of player we thought dante would be before we even drafted him.

I'm ok with that.
 
Can't say I don't agree with you ( me being an ******* and all), but saying fish was "acting" like a dumbass is not a personal attack. You should know this as you have turned personal attacks into a fine art.
All I was saying is that people try to predict how players will turn out all the time. I dint think it's something to get so upset about.

I wonder if you ever talked about what type of nba player you thought Anthony Bennett would be before he was drafted.
 
Again, I don't think anyone is that concerned with Exum, we understand he is very inexperienced and young and will improve tremendously. It's just puzzling that he has gone away from what was reported to be one of his biggest offensive strengths and embraced what was reported to be his biggest offensive weakness, which is cool if that means he comes back next year way stronger and attacks the rim and has a 3pt shot.

I just want to see him try to get to the rim and finish though. Hard to get better at something if you don't practice it in the games.

I agree but i think it is better if he is cautious at first and looks for the better players and shoots at .375 and .444 from three than throwing up a million bricks like Smart
 
Here is a snippet from espn.com that i read just this morning.
Utah Jazz



For a couple years, we heard about this mystery international import coming from Australia named Dante Exum. He was a point guard in a shooting guard's body. He was going to be the latest and greatest young guard to step into the NBA. But we hardly had any footage of him. The little there was available showed Exum going up against competition that looked like the younger brothers of the high school kids Al Jefferson destroyed in his pre-draft footage.

Now we get to see this lanky, slippery combo guard navigate lanes and angles in the NBA. He won't be an acquired taste like Vegemite (also, you shouldn't have to acquire a taste for anything, so the Vegemite supporters need to stop claiming its greatness). He'll be the future of Utah Jazz basketball


They are predicting exum to be the future of jazz basketball after only a couple of pre-season games. How dare they.

Lebron, dirk, garnett, kobe, deshawn, cj miles....... none of them played any college ball, yet i bet people still had thoughts and whether or not they would be stars, busts, or just average players.
 
By no means am I comparing Kobe and Exums skill set, but they are similar in age and hype. I pulled Kobe's rookie game log just to see how rough it was for him. His December and February were atrocious. I hope we fans understand this is a growing process for him. We will see the brilliance with the bad and will just have to be patient. Not saying we should not criticize him at all, but any bird brain calling him a bust at any point in the next few years is dumb.

The Kobe comparisons are embarrassing and do Exum no favors. Their rookie years are not similar in age and hype. As a rookie Kobe was eighteen, just out of high school, and a full year younger than Exum. By nineteen Kobe was an All-Star. He showed much more potential, much earlier than Exum.
 
Here is a snippet from espn.com that i read just this morning.
Utah Jazz



For a couple years, we heard about this mystery international import coming from Australia named Dante Exum. He was a point guard in a shooting guard's body. He was going to be the latest and greatest young guard to step into the NBA. But we hardly had any footage of him. The little there was available showed Exum going up against competition that looked like the younger brothers of the high school kids Al Jefferson destroyed in his pre-draft footage.

Now we get to see this lanky, slippery combo guard navigate lanes and angles in the NBA. He won't be an acquired taste like Vegemite (also, you shouldn't have to acquire a taste for anything, so the Vegemite supporters need to stop claiming its greatness). He'll be the future of Utah Jazz basketball


They are predicting exum to be the future of jazz basketball after only a couple of pre-season games. How dare they.

Lebron, dirk, garnett, kobe, deshawn, cj miles....... none of them played any college ball, yet i bet people still had thoughts and whether or not they would be stars, busts, or just average players.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
Again, I don't think anyone is that concerned with Exum, we understand he is very inexperienced and young and will improve tremendously. It's just puzzling that he has gone away from what was reported to be one of his biggest offensive strengths and embraced what was reported to be his biggest offensive weakness, which is cool if that means he comes back next year way stronger and attacks the rim and has a 3pt shot.

I just want to see him try to get to the rim and finish though. Hard to get better at something if you don't practice it in the games.

Could it be Quin has given him a couple of things to really work on? What better way to improve what are perceived as weaknesses than in preseason games?

I guess the board needs a new whipping boy and Dante is it. It just amazes me that he was ripped for his shooting, goes out and has a good shooting night (3-5) and now some are still unhappy about his shooting.

Shooting and defense: Snyder has mentioned those as key areas of focus - along with playing with pace.
 
The Kobe comparisons are embarrassing and do Exum no favors. Their rookie years are not similar in age and hype. As a rookie Kobe was eighteen, just out of high school, and a full year younger than Exum. By nineteen Kobe was an All-Star. He showed much more potential, much earlier than Exum.

OMG someone has reading comprehension issues. Lol
 
Amazing people still find things to bitch about - I'm not even going to try to judge Exum's game until about 40 games in. Right now I see plenty of potential and that's enough for me.

For me the excitement revolves around The Jazz finding two late round draft choices in Gobert and Hood who have starter-like talent written all over them within 1-3 years.

How the hell did Hood last to the 23rd pick?
 
How the hell did Hood last to the 23rd pick?

I question that too. Locke said that watching Duke he thought Hood was better than Parker. I thought he was crazy, but then watched some of the Duke games and although Parker was the highlight player, I felt Hood was just as good. His stroke is sexual...
 
Amazing people still find things to bitch about - I'm not even going to try to judge Exum's game until about 40 games in. Right now I see plenty of potential and that's enough for me.

For me the excitement revolves around The Jazz finding two late round draft choices in Gobert and Hood who have starter-like talent written all over them within 1-3 years.


How the hell did Hood last to the 23rd pick?

Ummm, you know that statement is making a judgement?
 
Top