Salty said:Or we could just listen to trout.
Easily the smartest thing you've said in this entire thread.
That's not saying much.
Salty said:Or we could just listen to trout.
Easily the smartest thing you've said in this entire thread.
Are you not following along or something? Nowhere did I say computer sales would be zero. Please show me where I said that. In several posts I said, and this is a copy and paste from one of my posts in this very thread:
"I agree there will be the abnormal case where someone needs a super powerful desktop for pro video production, video games that are better than current gen consoles, etc. But for average computing- email, web, word, excel, music, photos, home videos, current gen console quality gaming, skype, etc, these phones will be more than enough."
So you can stop trying to split hairs. I have been clear about my position since we had this discussion on the old board, and into this current thread.
I'm open to reasonable discourse. But when I clarify my argument, and you still try to split hairs and claim I really meant something else, that is not reasonable discourse. If you followed this thread, then you knew what my argument was. If you haven't followed the thread, then you need to get caught up before you go splitting hairs, because I have stated my argument many times now. And never once did I say PC sales would literally be zero. And you are the only one that brought that up. The "clowns" I called out in the first post knew what I meant. They never questioned PC sales being literally zero.Millions of units sold are "abnormal"? Within the 4 year time span you identified? I showed you the definition of your own thread title and tried to show that reasonably the PC will be around for a very long time. You said 4 years, and that at that point any PC use would be abnormal. But industry projections show not just that PCs will be in use but that the segment is going to actually grow over the next 5 years. I see you are not open to reasonable discourse.
I answered it already. Because the average user has been replacing their desktop with a laptop for a while now.
But smartphones are growing at an even faster rate.
So, watch that video in the first post and then come tell me why someone would buy a laptop after buying that phone.
Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
...argue with someone who makes a lot of money in this industry and has been reading Jazzfanz from a smartphone longer than anyone else (just ask Jason when I first started asking for a mobile version).
You do a pretty good job of spelling out exactly why smartphones will replace computers in the near future...not sure why I really want to wade into this debate, but I disagree with the premise that the smart phone will replace the computer, at least not within the time frame Salty mentions (4 years?)
a couple of points - -
Salty cites the fact that smart phone sales are growing at a faster rate than computer sales. This reflects a few things that really have nothing to do with a possible demise in the use of computers:
1 - phone companies keep offering special deals for upgrading phones, giving consumers an incentive to do so every two years or less. That doesn't seem to be the case with computers.
2 - at this point, the technology on the phones is evolving more rapidly that the technology on computers, again providing folks with an incentive to replace their cell phone
3 - families are buying these phones for their children, it's not unusual for a family of 5 to have 5 different cell phones on their plan. It's more unusual for that family to have 5 separate computers in their household. Just because a family has 5 smart phones but only 2 computers in the household does not mean that they are replacing all the tasks done with the computer by using their smart phone.
Also, I agree with those who say that as folks age, or for young kids who lack the manual dexterity for a phone's keyboard, many people will prefer to use the computer (I'm not differentiating between a desktop and laptop here) because of its larger screen and keyboard. Perhaps as Salty says, that will be replaced by smart phone "add-ons" that will mimic a larger computer, but I'm not sure folks will be in a hurry to spend the money it will take to totally revamp what they already have. Perhaps somewhere down the line that will happen, but for the foreseeable future I don't see consumers spending the money to do so.
Nor do I think corporations are going to be willing to make the investment to revamp their product line to develop and promote those sorts of gadgets given the current economic climate.
As you may know, I don't have a "smart" phone so I can't really speak from personal experience. I do have an ipod touch which is pretty similar, it just can't make phone calls and needs wifi rather than being able to access the phone system. But it does alot and carries no service charges, a big plus in my book.
But my kids all do have smart phones, and I see them use their phones all the time. They also have laptops, and they're often using both simultaneously. Now perhaps there is a way to do that with one device, I don't know, but from what I observe, it seems it would be pretty difficult.
Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.