orangello
Well-Known Member
It's been ugly. I'm still a little foggy as to why he's still getting close to 20 minutes per game.Booker has fallen off badly, he tricked us all. Never bet on undersized PFs, it doesn't end well.
It's been ugly. I'm still a little foggy as to why he's still getting close to 20 minutes per game.Booker has fallen off badly, he tricked us all. Never bet on undersized PFs, it doesn't end well.
If Kanter is in the Jazz long term plans it would make sense for them to limit his exposure this year to hopefully lower his value.
Like Booker?
I'm assuming that those are for the entire season. I bet they look drastically worse if it was based on the last two weeks.Booker per 36 is 13.9 Pts s on .534% Fg, 7.1 Reb, 17.2% tov, 7.8 ORb%, 15.3 DRB % 11.6TRB%, 58% from FT!!!, 38% from 3 (pretty good). Booker is also 27 and 6'7"
Kanter per 36 is 19.9 pts on 55% FG, 9.5 reb on 11.3 % ORB (one of the best in league), 20% DRB, 15.7 TRB%, 76% FT, and 31% from 3. Kanter is 6'11" and 22!!!
Kanter's PER is 19.20
A PER of 15 is an average NBA starter.
Booker's PER is 14.46
Booker is not a replacement, he is a very, very clear downgrade.
All stats from Basketball-Reference, except PER's were gathered from ESPN.
I'm assuming that those are for the entire season. I bet they look drastically worse if it was based on the last two weeks.
Kanter's been playing much better recently, but the stats you use aren't terribly convincing.Booker is not a replacement, he is a very, very clear downgrade.
If Kanter is in the Jazz long term plans it would make sense for them to limit his exposure this year to hopefully lower his value.
So another reason is already in the pocket to tell why Enes performs bad when he does this year.If Kanter is in the Jazz long term plans it would make sense for them to limit his exposure this year to hopefully lower his value.