What's new
By:
Filters

BUMP: This Thread when the Lakers SUCK!

Yep I had this dream that the Lakers completely gave Timofey Mozgoz an near max salary right out of the gate during the free agency period this summer. It was awesome! But then I realized that LA would never replace Kobe Bryant with Timofey freakin' Mozgov and calmed down a bit. It seemed so real though!
 
framer said:
Yep I had this dream that the Lakers completely gave Timofey Mozgoz an near max salary right out of the gate during the free agency period this summer. It was awesome! But then I realized that LA would never replace Kobe Bryant with Timofey freakin' Mozgov and calmed down a bit. It seemed so real though!
Click to expand...
Wow, that would have been so awesome! But as much as I hate the Lakers I have to admit that not only do they have huge competitive advantages, they've also always been smart about making the most of them. So I cannot imagine the fantasy world of your dreams where it is even slightly conceivable that something like that could possibly happen. Rushing to give Timofy Mozgov the max, HAHAHAHA! That's a good one. Nice imagination, dude.
pizza.gif
 
Whether they are being successful or not the Lakers will ALWAYS suck!


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I am so proud .. Just walked past a sports store with a lakers jersey in the window and my 10 year old daughter blurts out loud @ why would anyone hang THAT up, the Lakers suck a million pieces of crap!!!"

I am the father of the year for the Southern Hemisphere ...
 
DownUnder said:
I am so proud .. Just walked past a sports store with a lakers jersey in the window and my 10 year old daughter blurts out loud @ why would anyone hang THAT up, the Lakers suck a million pieces of crap!!!"

I am the father of the year for the Southern Hemisphere ...
Click to expand...

Why? Success speaks for itself. Don't have to like the Lakers but to diss them at all shows the lack of reality of parenting that you do. If my 10 year old kid ever asked that question id make him go to Wikipedia and look up Lakers and see how many Chips they have,. They play this game to win titles not to just make the playoffs. The difference between the Lakers and Jazz are night and day. Jazz are happy with making playoffs maybe winnign a series and then going home, To a jazz fan that is a good year. To the lakers they are beyond just making the playoffs to be happy. They expect titles...You don't see me going around being an expert at Aussie rules gfootball do you? This is like me commenting on a successful Aussie team and saying they suck when the reality is they do not. Here in AMERICA thwey have a show called first take and I have seen the Lakers being discussed on the show multiple tiems and I have yet to see them even mention the Jazz. I love being right all the time. I love so many of you were claiming a 3 or 4 seed and right now the Jazz are in 9nth place. I said they would be fighting for the last 2 playoff spots with other teams and one of the teams I mentioned were the Lakers. A team with no star is not going win in this league. Jazz havce very good role players but they need to trade and get a big dog.With the culture in Utah being what it is, it slims your options on who to go get. Id go get Jabari if I was the jazz and then Selct Jackson kid from Duke this year, Might have to move up a few spots but I see the Jazz drafting around 12-15.
Take a look at this starting lineup
Jackson
Hood
Parker
Favors
Gobert

Bench of Exum, Trey Lyles, and couple other


Now that's a squad. You would have an athletic backcourt with Jackson and Exum, Shootign of Hood, All around scoring of Parker, Favors can do what he does and that's a junkyard dog type, Hustle points, and then Gobert is sorry on offense but with that team on defense he would be needed. That lineup is athletic and long. Of course we all know the Jazz wont do this because they think Hayward is a star player.lmao
 
The Lakers are definitely at least decent, which means their capitalizing on their tank from last season. Lou Williams doesn't get enough credit. 25PER so far this year.
 
ncoloradojazz said:
Why? Success speaks for itself. Don't have to like the Lakers but to diss them at all shows the lack of reality of parenting that you do. If my 10 year old kid ever asked that question id make him go to Wikipedia and look up Lakers and see how many Chips they have,. They play this game to win titles not to just make the playoffs. The difference between the Lakers and Jazz are night and day. Jazz are happy with making playoffs maybe winnign a series and then going home, To a jazz fan that is a good year. To the lakers they are beyond just making the playoffs to be happy. They expect titles...You don't see me going around being an expert at Aussie rules gfootball do you? This is like me commenting on a successful Aussie team and saying they suck when the reality is they do not. Here in AMERICA thwey have a show called first take and I have seen the Lakers being discussed on the show multiple tiems and I have yet to see them even mention the Jazz. I love being right all the time. I love so many of you were claiming a 3 or 4 seed and right now the Jazz are in 9nth place. I said they would be fighting for the last 2 playoff spots with other teams and one of the teams I mentioned were the Lakers. A team with no star is not going win in this league. Jazz havce very good role players but they need to trade and get a big dog.With the culture in Utah being what it is, it slims your options on who to go get. Id go get Jabari if I was the jazz and then Selct Jackson kid from Duke this year, Might have to move up a few spots but I see the Jazz drafting around 12-15.
Take a look at this starting lineup
Jackson
Hood
Parker
Favors
Gobert

Bench of Exum, Trey Lyles, and couple other


Now that's a squad. You would have an athletic backcourt with Jackson and Exum, Shootign of Hood, All around scoring of Parker, Favors can do what he does and that's a junkyard dog type, Hustle points, and then Gobert is sorry on offense but with that team on defense he would be needed. That lineup is athletic and long. Of course we all know the Jazz wont do this because they think Hayward is a star player.lmao
Click to expand...

tl;dr


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
PG_AB said:
The Lakers are definitely at least decent, which means their capitalizing on their tank from last season. Lou Williams doesn't get enough credit. 25PER so far this year.
Click to expand...

Best thing for the lakers too is this makes them a very attractive destination for free agency. LOL at all those who were counting the Lakers out during the off season, You don't win chips over that many years by fluke. Expect a big name signing by them within the next 2 years. 4 years from now they will be legit contenders for a title after they get that big name free agent. I loved the Nance kid coming out of Wyoming when many were shocked myself included when he went round 1.
 
Kinda sad that their worst loss is now to the Maverick's instead of us, but I'll take it.

1 2 3 4 Total
Lakers 22 11 22 18 73
Mavericks 29 38 23 32 122



THIS WAS THE WORST LOSS IN LAKERS FRANCHISE HISTORY
The Lakers waited less than a year to break a franchise record for the worst loss in the team's history. L.A. lost by 48 points in Utah on March 28, 2016 -- with Byron Scott as head coach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top