What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

And even if it hasn't been debunked, IT DOESN'T MATTER. If there were legitimate evidence of wrongdoing, the proper course would be to have the FBI investigate, probably in conjunction with the State Department. NOT to send non-governmental individuals to the country to demand through back channels that they must announce an investigation or else aid will be withheld.
 
In other news, I finally added a third individual to my ignore list. All of a sudden it's much faster for me to read through new posts on this thread. For some reason.
 
In other news, I finally added a third individual to my ignore list. All of a sudden it's much faster for me to read through new posts on this thread. For some reason.

I would ignore you too, but I can't since you are a "Staff Member".

I know how you guys like your "echo-chambers".
 
I would ignore you too, but I can't since you are a "Staff Member".

I know how you guys like your "echo-chambers".

I mean, in all honesty, if you tried to engage most of us in a meaningful conversation I think you could. It's not really realistic to spam the thread with Breitbart and Fox News tweets, and expect a constructive dialog to emerge as a result, is it?
 
Sooooo...

what’s it gonna take to ban heathme? Literally none of his posts in the past several pages has anything to do with the thread. Why have a rule against trolling if it’s not enforced?

Why is a mod @colton placing him on ignore when it’s clear that a simple enforcement of the rules would be a better solution? I mean if he (a very patient and civil poster) is putting you on ignore, it’s pretty safe to assume that rules are being broken too. If heathme creates a new profile ban it. Eventually he’ll learn to either stop posting or engage and not troll.

Right? Or is it enforcing bans too impossible? I’d like to understand this since I’ve never seen this poster engage with anyone in a meaningful way.
 
Last edited:
And even if it hasn't been debunked, IT DOESN'T MATTER. If there were legitimate evidence of wrongdoing, the proper course would be to have the FBI investigate, probably in conjunction with the State Department. NOT to send non-governmental individuals to the country to demand through back channels that they must announce an investigation or else aid will be withheld.
Yep. The bolded is the key indicator that it was never about corruption by any Biden.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Sooooo...

what’s it gonna take to ban heathme? Literally none of his posts in the past several pages has anything to do with the thread. Why have a rule against trolling if it’s not enforced?

Why is a mod @colton placing him on ignore when it’s clear that a simple enforcement of the rules would be a better solution?
Honestly, I don't really care if he is here or not. I never read his posts anyways. I don't think anyone really does. It's like he is banned already tbh. Nothing much would change if he actually got banned.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I mean, in all honesty, if you tried to engage most of us in a meaningful conversation I think you could. It's not really realistic to spam the thread with Breitbart and Fox News tweets, and expect a constructive dialog to emerge as a result, is it?

There are currently two of us on the entire thread right now posting anything that refutes the garbage you guys post all day and night. At times there will be three to five of us at any given time. I post information on why Trump should not be impeached. Go ahead and ban me if you like. Keep your echo-chamber.
 
There are currently two of us on the entire thread right now posting anything that refutes the garbage you guys post all day and night. At times there will be three to five of us at any given time. I post information on why Trump should not be impeached. Go ahead and ban me if you like. Keep your echo-chamber.

You're being unnecessarily antagonist/aggressive, though, if you aren't aware. I happen to think-- and I know a lot of us feel this way-- that opposing views are important and needed. None of us is looking for an 'echo chamber', but we also don't appreciate participation from folks who simply dismiss our opinions because we don't agree. Why not articulate your views in a way that allows people to think and feel differently? You're your own echo chamber, in a way...

Edit: Look at the way JoeBags conducts himself, if you're not sure what I mean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Sooooo...

what’s it gonna take to ban heathme? Literally none of his posts in the past several pages has anything to do with the thread. Why have a rule against trolling if it’s not enforced?

Why is a mod @colton placing him on ignore when it’s clear that a simple enforcement of the rules would be a better solution? I mean if he (a very patient and civil poster) is putting you on ignore, it’s pretty safe to assume that rules are being broken too. If heathme creates a new profile ban it. Eventually he’ll learn to either stop posting or engage and not troll.

Right? Or is it enforcing bans too impossible? I’d like to understand this since I’ve never seen this poster engage with anyone in a meaningful way.

If we have evidence that a current poster is a reincarnation of a banned one, we do re-ban automatically. It's the evidence part that I think we're lacking here.

And regarding trolling--if you see posts you think qualify as trolling, please report them. They will then get discussed by the mods.
 
You're being unnecessarily antagonist/aggressive, though, if you aren't aware. I happen to think-- and I know a lot of us feel this way-- that opposing views are important and needed. None of us is looking for an 'echo chamber', but we also don't appreciate participation from folks who simply dismiss our opinions because we don't agree. Why not articulate your views in a way that allows people to think and feel differently? You're your own echo chamber, in a way...
Who are you talking to? LOL.
 
If we have evidence that a current poster is a reincarnation of a banned one, we do re-ban automatically. It's the evidence part that I think we're lacking here.

And regarding trolling--if you see posts you think qualify as trolling, please report them. They will then get discussed by the mods.

fair enough. I’ve been reporting him almost everyday now for a while.

I think there is ample evidence to tell that he’s heathme. I’m not sure if he was ever banned. But they’re clearly the same poster.
 
Top