Search results

I agree with not giving up Exum, Hood, or Mitchell & not sure I would even give up any picks regardless of protection (unless we intend on making additional moves to remain competitive-which would be a mistake IMO). If that's the approach we choose, Favors for Crowder is intriguing (assuming...

I agree. I don't know about the league-wide consensus, but Crowder is definitely underrated by the Celtic fanbase

What would you be willing, if anything, to give up for him? Personally, I don't see him moving the needle enough (unless we're content with being a 2nd tier team) to justify giving up any of our limited assets for.

BOS needs to clear salary to sign Hayward but really has no incentive (as far as I can tell) to include Crowder in a S&T as he certainly has value to other teams. Only way it happens is if it's to appease Hayward. Otherwise, I'm not sure it makes sense to use assets on him as it likely only...

I'd be surprised if anything comes of this but Crowder would be a great consolation as well as a good fit (considering position, age, attitude, contract, etc). I would prefer Smart/Bradley but both are due for extensions shortly & would likely be somewhat redundant on this roster, assuming...

My previous post was in response to this.

You're right...Guess I should've traced it back a step further, figured that was implied. Thanks for clarifying.

I agree in theory but the reality is that, as great as Gobert is, there are disadvantages to re-building around him (considering our current talent level). I would only contemplate doing so if the offer justified it, but his contract would essentially limit our window to the length of his...

In the end, I think it was Hayward's relationship with Stevens that was the deciding factor. Allowing CHA to cause him to receive the opt-out was obviously a factor but, as great as QS is, IMO DL's biggest mistake to date is not hiring BS (not to take away from everything QS has accomplished)...

The 4th year is concerning considering age/late development but worth the risk IMO as it likely increases the odds of retaining Hayward. Also, Ingles' character/work ethic increases the likelihood that he is able to maintain or increase his current level of play. Not to mention the intangibles...

Great value considering age, contract, potential + lottery protection on OKC pick. Don't like the fit, tho replacing Favors with a stretch 4 would help. As long as this doesn't affect Hayward's decision, which I don't think it will, I don't see how this could be a bad move.

At minimum, Mitchell should become the lockdown perimeter defender we will need to compete with GSW in the future. Personally, I believe he has the potential to develop into one of the better 2-way players in the league. His physical tools & mentality make him a fairly safe bet IMO...

Rumor is NYK asked BOS for Crowder/Brown/#3/BKN 2018 1st. Although the actual asking price likely isn't quite that high, I strongly doubt Favors/Exum & taking back Noah even gets us into the conversation.

If anything, I feel better about our chances of re-signing Hayward. I think Mitchell's attitude/work ethic is perfect for this team/locker room (not that a rookie will have much, if any, impact on Hayward's decision). Plus, BOS seems very happy with Tatum & I believe they would have gone in a...

Great trade, surprised Lyles was enough to move from #24 to #13

If CHI trades Butler to BOS, Fultz is who they would target IMO as they need a potential star to re-build around & wouldn't have to rely on ping pong balls as they would if they opted for future picks instead. Maybe CHI values someone at #3 + future 1st(s) over Fultz but the rumor is that BOS is...

I bet Ainge is targeting that unprotected SAC 2019 1st. If he pulled that off, they could potentially have a top 5 pick in 4 consecutive drafts (Brown/#3/BKN 18/SAC 19)

Do people prefer Fultz or Jackson/2018 LAL 1st?

PHI could likely outbid us without even touching Embiid/Simmons. Some combination #3/LAL 2018/Saric/Okafor/Covington/other future picks would be more valuable to a rebuilding team than anything we can offer (without including GH/RG). I believe PHI would also have the ability to absorb salary...

Cousins wasn't locked up for 4 yrs tho & had/has more concerns/risk surrounding him than Lillard. Also, SAC inexplicably values Hield much higher than most/all so obviously they view the return more favorably. Unless POR inexplicably over-values one of our assets, the Cousins trade isn't really...