Search results

At this point in the Jazz rebuild, when examining this trade, all other players on the jazz are essentially irrelevant. You get the centerpiece and then you fit the right pieces around him. So it means you trade your other players as needed to get the right mix. It could cost the Jazz...

Thanks for looking that up - the correlation to excellence is not as high as I imagined.

Someone outlined these before in some thread a while back. I'll repeat it Name..........ht...wt....reach TB3 ...........6'1 187...8'1.25 Chris Paul. ...6'1..178...7'9 Steve Nash...6'1 187 Tony Parker..6'2 177 Rajon Rondo. 6.1...188 Mike Conley...6.1...175..7.10.5 D...

I compared to Burke to Parker earlier in the thread for the purpose of illustrating that because someone doesn't have "all that" in their rookie year, then its time to give up on them. Also, I compared them because they are physically similar. You noted earlier in a previous post of yours...

The title of the thread is about SPECIFIC players , not about a generalized theory of trading. I don't believe in the premise that Kanter And Burke have to go...

Burke is a Keeper.. His stats as a rookie are comparable to Tony Parker's,. Physically his similar to Parker. If he will become like Parker Can't be discerned from his rookie year and from last year's situation (Corbin, Hayfence, etc.). I am convinced that his Skill set and mentality are there...

I dont believe in the premise of the thread, but the discussion has been great. Cowhide has been "killing it" as is said in these parts...

His DX video showed he is a good off-ball defender. I have hig confidence in this aspect of his game.

I think the jazz wrote that article and handed it to Tony Jones. I find it hard to believe that the jazz would be that open about moving favors without WANTING to advertise. Don't know if it is a smokescreen or legit attempt to get offers for trading up.(the article posted by Vermin)

Of course... with the same effectiveness as Randle

I'm willing to bet the Jazz "think about buying out his contract every year at this time of year...." Ultimately, Tomic being mentioned is just one of many press related statements that are for enticing others to bite on trading up, down, out etc. Tomic is one more asset the Jazz are dangling...

I agree. Ithink much or most of the "trends" that are unfolding are anything but false information. It will be a while before the real lay of the land syarts to solidify.

One small nugget of news and you turn it into some form of hatred for you team. This is your pattern. So it is time to leave rather than threaten...

His intangebles are highly rated, which gives me hope for his improve ment. Gordon was also all over the court with hustle and fight in him which is a great sign. I realize there are a lot of people who have overcome shooting troubles, but has anyone ever come from where AG is at this point?

I think at this stage in his BB maturity, it is clear he is low IQ. Also, it means (probably) that it is not natural in him. I think it is correctable, but will never be "high". Fortunately for NV, he will not be called on to have high BBIQ (like a PG is supposed to have.) DX video showed a...

In my second post after the long one, I said he probably won't...

No, No, and No. (But thanks for askin')

With a 'strong' or notable H.

And to compound the "opposites" issue on the Gordon/Vonleh debate, is that NV is a PF who Jazz have plenty of, and AG is really a SF which Jazz don't have. Also, it seems clear to me why NV stock would rise during the pre-draft activities. His physical skillsets are easier to see and...

I watched 30 mins of DX video. Gordon and Vonleh. many of you might know all this, but because I watched their videos, I thought I'd post what I saw. . Short summary: These two appear similar but are "opposites:" Gordon is 6' 8.75", Vonleh is 6' 9.5" So being only .75" difference they...