Search results

Because of finances?

Jefferson doesn't necessarily have great height for playing center, but he does have the body for it.

The market has spoken.

My bad. Too lazy to look through all the threads.

I don't see an Al Harrington thread, so I thought I would point this out for those who haven't seen it yet. From what Al Harrington is posting on his twitter he seems to be leaning towards Utah. https://twitter.com/a7harrington On a side note his twitter is VERY informative. From just...

Damn that was clever. Now ban this mutha******

What a total jinx thread. Not a good idea.

Boom B*****s.

Detail to me how the Jazz win a championship starting with a foundation of last year's roster. Go.

I am very happy that we are starting the mini-rebuilding process we should have started 2 years ago. Letting Boozer go is a great development and not overpaying for Korver and possibly not overpaying of Matthews are smart moves by O'Connor, but there's still a long way to go.

I don't want Brewer back. Especially with mulit-year contract attached.

Tolliver would be great as a 15-20 minute back-up to Millsap. He's one of those energy guys that could bring a spark off the bench. He shouldn't be starting in the league like he did with Golden State, but that at least gave him a chance to show what he can do.

How to get Gortat. First we're gonna need a black van and some ski masks...

Well then, today is New York's lucky day.

The claim that Allen only has 1 or 2 years left to live sounds like total bs to me. The survival rate for non-hodgkins lymphoma is 70% for all people and probably much higher for someone with as much money as Paul Allen. In the reports I looked up Allen says he is confident he will beat the...

Damn. I freaking loved Matthews and Korver. It's really sad to see them go, but Utah is doing the right thing in rebuilding.

I like Cream, does that count?

:confused: You think most unemployed people have savings to tap into or assets to sell? Are we living on the same planet here?

Seriously, what is the problem here? If you cut unemployment benefits you're only going to increase the supply of labor in an already oversaturated market and make finding a job that much harder. The government should be focused on creating DEMAND for labor, not on increasing the SUPPLY of...

Because otherwise unemployed people wouldn't have any money, and if they didn't have money they wouldn't be spending any, and if they aren't spending any money then it lowers the profits of the businesses they would otherwise spend money at, and when businesses make lower profits they start...