What's new
By:

2011 draft.....

My big board, not mock draft.
1. Irving
2. Knight
3. Williams
4. Kanter
5. T. Jones
6 biyomobo
7. Vesley
8. Walker
9. Klay thompson ( mocks are showing him in the lottery now as i predicted here first)
10. Hamilton.
11. Burkes
12. Tristan
 
The Thriller said:
So if a player like Biyombo or Kanter (although I have reservations about his athleticism and durability) is available when we pick, I think we should take one. Our frontline is still undersized, nonathletic, and pretty defensively inept (especially Millsap. Who should really be thinking about moving to the SF spot).

Even if they don't turn out to be great, at least they're big. They'll bring size.
Click to expand...

I guess you're not juiced about this year's J. Jack?

This is Blazers philosophy, you know, the one they used when they passed on McKevin Jordant.
 
My big board
1. Irving
2. Williams
3. Biyombo
4. Knight
5. Kanter
6. Walker
7. Jones
8. Hamilton
9. Burks
10. Klay
11. Vessely
12. Tristan or Donatas
 
NAOS said:
I guess you're not juiced about this year's J. Jack?

This is Blazers philosophy, you know, the one they used when they passed on McKevin Jordant.
Click to expand...

So who's the Michael Jordan of this draft?

Who's the Durant?

Does Biyombo have a long history of injuries?

Dumbass. Instead of taking a cheap shot why not offer something to the thread?
 
The Thriller said:
So who's the Michael Jordan of this draft?

Who's the Durant?

Does Biyombo have a long history of injuries?

Dumbass. Instead of taking a cheap shot why not offer something to the thread?
Click to expand...

the point is, Mr. Asscooker, you don't pass on Irving or DWill2. Why do you have to make your annual hyperbolic statements about the draft and the the state of this team before the lottery balls even fall?
This thread is over 130 pages long. I've made my contribution. When you do the research you'll find that I've wrapped my opinions in conditional statements -- not trenchant sort of best-philosophy-EVAR kind of approach that you take.

Also, the Jack burn is just awesome. It will be repeated.

EDIT: on second thought, is the Jack comment really a burn? Is it a burn to bring up your behavior the LAST TIME THE JAZZ WERE IN THIS SITUATION? I'm thinking 'no' on both accounts. My statements here are my latest contribution to this board: don't get thrilled by the o gatino
 
Last edited:
my draft board (Not a mock):

1. Irving
2. Williams
3. Biyombo
4. Knight
5. Kanter
6. Walker
7. Jonas V
8. Vesely
9. Donatas M.
10. Hamilton
11. T. Jones
12. Faried (I'm staying stoked on this dude, even though I'd be disappointed if we picked him at #12)
 
NAOS said:
the point is, Mr. Asscooker, you don't pass on Irving or DWill2. Why do you have to make your annual hyperbolic statements about the draft and the the state of this team before the lottery balls even fall?
This thread is over 130 pages long. I've made my contribution. When you do the research you'll find that I've wrapped my opinions in conditional statements -- not trenchant sort of best-philosophy-EVAR kind of approach that you take.

Also, the Jack burn is just awesome. It will be repeated.

EDIT: on second thought, is the Jack comment really a burn? Is it a burn to bring up your behavior the LAST TIME THE JAZZ WERE IN THIS SITUATION? I'm thinking 'no' on both accounts. My statements here are my latest contribution to this board: don't get thrilled by the o gatino
Click to expand...

No one said that we should pass on Irving or Dwill2 dumbass.

But do you really think we're going to be in the top 2?

How about you join the rest of us in reality and understand that we're probably picking #6.
 
As much as I hate to admit but I agree with thriller but until the balls drop we are picking 6th. So why think otherwise?
 
The Thriller said:
No one said that we should pass on Irving or Dwill2 dumbass.

But do you really think we're going to be in the top 2?

How about you join the rest of us in reality and understand that we're probably picking #6.
Click to expand...

join you in reality? LMFAO

the chances of #6 ending up in the top 3 are not ridiculously low, and that would ENTIRELY change your big-man-or-bust attitude that is smelling a lot like Jack-or-bust from a few years back. My point is that you need to calm the **** down for a few weeks and think in conditional statements... you know, the 'if, ... then,' variety.

Okay, so I overplayed my hand (*** for tat) by referencing DWill2 and Irving, but your position leaves Knight and Walker in the ****ing ditch, which is stupid as hell. But, what's new?
 
Xthren said:
As much as I hate to admit but I agree with thriller but until the balls drop we are picking 6th. So why think otherwise?
Click to expand...

how the hell did this guy go from neg rep points and a red light to a rep power of 4 in a couple of weeks? fishy.
 
Hypothetical situation, Minnesota drafts Irving, Cleveland drafts Williams, Toronto drafts Kanter, Washington drafts Biyombo, and Sacramento drafts Walker.

Who would you want the Jazz to take at #6?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top