What's new
By:

2011 draft.....

I know word on the street is that Cavs are taking Irving with the 1st pick, but I wouldn't etch that in stone. I think this draft has 4 potential stars, and after that it is filled with players that range from really solid pros to quality role players. The 4 potential stars are 1. Irving, 2. Williams, 3. Kanter, 4. Knight. Given that the Cavs have picks #1 and #4, I could see how they would not want to run the risk of drafting Irving and then seeing Knight (who by the way I remember hearing they were very high on a little while ago) as the BPA at #4. So I could definitely see them taking Williams or Kanter #1 and then taking whichever PG is left at #4. So for all you Irving fans, it's not out of the question.
 
If we were to land Irving....I would cream myself.

But regardless, the options of Derrick Williams and Enes Kanter is one that I never thought that we would have, and I'm incredibly happy. We're gonna get a good player and that's a relief.

I'm not sure I understand the love with Burks. He's a good player, but we really don't need a 2-guard. Hayward is our 2-guard, we need somebody who can play the 3 and I don't think Burks can.
 
Hantlers said:
If we were to land Irving....I would cream myself.

But regardless, the options of Derrick Williams and Enes Kanter is one that I never thought that we would have, and I'm incredibly happy. We're gonna get a good player and that's a relief.

I'm not sure I understand the love with Burks. He's a good player, but we really don't need a 2-guard. Hayward is our 2-guard, we need somebody who can play the 3 and I don't think Burks can.
Click to expand...

Holy **** people need to realize Hayward can play the 3. There is no point in taking an inferior SF if there is a better SG. Stop being so stupid people.
 
Speaking of creaming oneself, here me out on this one. We all know that KAHHHHHHNNNN lacks a chromosome or two and word is he's going to shop the #2. So the Jazz give up Millsap, Bell, & #12 for #2 & Wesley Johnson. Then we could possibly have the choice of taking Williams/Knight or Kanter/Irving. Now tell me you did not just go from 6 to midnight (or at least a chubby).
 
margodydek said:
Speaking of creaming oneself, here me out on this one. We all know that KAHHHHHHNNNN lacks a chromosome or two and word is he's going to shop the #2. So the Jazz give up Millsap, Bell, & #12 for #2 & Wesley Johnson. Then we could possibly have the choice of taking Williams/Knight or Kanter/Irving. Now tell me you did not just go from 6 to midnight (or at least a chubby).
Click to expand...

dream on, buddy.
 
billyshelby said:
It might also turn out to be the only position he can play.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I like Hayward as a 2 guard offensively, but there are some damn quick 2 guards in the league I think Hayward would struggle to man guard at times. Take BPA wing player, Hayward gives us flexibility so it would be stupid to have tunnel vision on a 2 or 3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top