What's new
By:

2014 College Football

Green ****tin on everyone here. K state, Oklahoma, every SEC team.. Basically everyone sucks and the whole system is some corrupt facade to promote bad teams from bad conferences (aka those not in the pac-12).

Since green seems to think his analysis is definitive, let's apply it in reverse to see if it holds true for utahs schedule.

Idaho st: fcs

Fresno st: suck

Michigan: suck

Washington st: loss

Ucla: only won by 2 (margin of victory hurts k st, so 2 point margin = not impressive). Let's see how good UCLA really is.
- five very narrow wins vs bad teams (uva, ut, Memphis, cal, colo)
- double digit loss at home to the supposedly best team in the conference
- loss at home to unranked utah who had been weak the previous two seasons
- big win against asu, but since we don't know the strength of the conference really, who knows how good a win it actually was?
UCLA conclusion = not a top-25 team and therefore not that impressive of a win

Oregon st: suck (only have wins vs WEAK ooc teams and have lost all conference match ups except vs a crappy Colorado

Usc: not a top 25 team either. Three losses already, one to BC??

Asu: super good team "supposedly" although we don't really know because their ooc slate sucked (weber and unm? Ha!)

So basically, utah has a **** out of conference slate, and so far, the teams they've beat have had **** ones as well. So who really knows how good they are? Maybe 15 is too generous.


@green, this post was satirical. Utah is a good team having a good season, but your argument is a ****ing house of cards. It's stupid. You're stupid. Stop. Stop!
 
I didn't know there was anybody left who hadn't hidden green from their feed.

Please stop quoting him.

thanks.
 
scootsy said:
Green ****tin on everyone here. K state, Oklahoma, every SEC team.. Basically everyone sucks and the whole system is some corrupt facade to promote bad teams from bad conferences (aka those not in the pac-12).

Since green seems to think his analysis is definitive, let's apply it in reverse to see if it holds true for utahs schedule.

Idaho st: fcs

Fresno st: suck

Michigan: suck

Washington st: loss

Ucla: only won by 2 (margin of victory hurts k st, so 2 point margin = not impressive). Let's see how good UCLA really is.
- five very narrow wins vs bad teams (uva, ut, Memphis, cal, colo)
- double digit loss at home to the supposedly best team in the conference
- loss at home to unranked utah who had been weak the previous two seasons
- big win against asu, but since we don't know the strength of the conference really, who knows how good a win it actually was?
UCLA conclusion = not a top-25 team and therefore not that impressive of a win

Oregon st: suck (only have wins vs WEAK ooc teams and have lost all conference match ups except vs a crappy Colorado

Usc: not a top 25 team either. Three losses already, one to BC??

Asu: super good team "supposedly" although we don't really know because their ooc slate sucked (weber and unm? Ha!)

So basically, utah has a **** out of conference slate, and so far, the teams they've beat have had **** ones as well. So who really knows how good they are? Maybe 15 is too generous.


@green, this post was satirical. Utah is a good team having a good season, but your argument is a ****ing house of cards. It's stupid. You're stupid. Stop. Stop!
Click to expand...
Good post.
 
green said:
Cy keeps bringing up the WSU loss as Utah's downfall. The funny thing is, Mississippi State has give up plays of 60 yards or more every game this year. Against that piss poor schedule. I'm not 100% sure Mississippi State beats WSU's passing game.

Look at what Kentucky and UAB did to that defense. Mississippi State might win, but it would be a game.

They gave up 435 yards passing to UAB. You think WSU, Leach and Halliday couldn't get 500+ on Mississippi State?

But, dat SEC doe. Dey for reals. Look at dat schedule. Week in week out. Grind. Hells ya.
Click to expand...

Who gives a **** about yards?

State has one of the best red zone defenses in the nation and turns the ball over on defense.

You have been negged for being an absolute tard.
 
PKM said:
bully
Click to expand...

Pointing to yards as a reason a team sucks is beyond retarded, it's even more retarded than nitpicking narrow wins.

A win is a win (through means of scoring points) until Football changes the rules to measure points in yards. Maybe when that happens the PAC-12 can finally start to beat the SEC.
 
Also, maybe the PAC-12 is too scared to schedule games against the SEC? Thought about that?

SEC schedules games against all the other big conferences. Come at us PAC-12.

I challenge y'all to send Oregon to Kentucky next year. Kentucky's QB would **** all over PAC-12 defense.
 
Cy said:
Also, maybe the PAC-12 is too scared to schedule games against the SEC? Thought about that?

SEC schedules games against all the other big conferences. Come at us PAC-12.

I challenge y'all to send Oregon to Kentucky next year. Kentucky's QB would **** all over PAC-12 defense.
Click to expand...

Nope. SEC has exactly ZERO good QB's. I would quote for proof but am honoring NAOS' request over humoring greenwithenvy.
 
PKM said:
Nope. SEC has exactly ZERO good QB's. I would quote for proof but am honoring NAOS' request over humoring greenwithenvy.
Click to expand...

Srsly think y'alls QB is legit awesome. If he gets some better WR in the next 2 years I think he could be a beast, as well as the coaching staff trusting their RB's more.
 
Cy said:
Srsly think y'alls QB is legit awesome. If he gets some better WR in the next 2 years I think he could be a beast, as well as the coaching staff trusting their RB's more.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Towles is legit.. and young. Our special teams sucks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top