Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.
I didn't decide ****.
You all knew the rules before we started any of the matchups.
Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.
Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.
Which means that seeding and standings does not affect the outcomes of the latter rounds. If you have a better team (and more alts) you win.
Edit: you know the alt joke kinda feels weak now that the voting has come to a really just point. I like how this tourney rolls. And it's away from the recency bias too.
Advise for the next year:
Let's hide the names of posters too to avoid popularity contests until champion is decided.
How the **** would we do this? How would people know whose turn it is?
I'd prefer u not be an idiot. He didn't pick the matchups. Read the rules next time!!
So how were the 1st round matchups decided?
Remaining participants need time to create more alts.Why aren't we going yet?
So how were the 1st round matchups decided?