I think that sounds cool. Am good with either, but I think this keeps it fun and interesting.How does that sound @NUMBERICA
I think that sounds cool. Am good with either, but I think this keeps it fun and interesting.How does that sound @NUMBERICA
I’m pretty sure WC called me amateurish or something for wanting to change the game mid stream, but eh... what the hell he pissed me off pretty good, so let’s do it. There will be player stealing... winner can steal a bench player from the team they beat, then winners in third round will be able to steal a starter from either team they beat in the second or third round to give the two teams a better chance to get a player that fits their team best. If WC bitches about that he is forfeit.
@NUMBERICA @Wes Mantooth @White Chocolate @Ellis269 @Beer @David Hume @tfivas @Hekate @gandalfe @Troat Guru @Ron Mexico
I’ve finally come to my senses. The all time jazz draft is the perfect time and event to experiment with.
Rules for player stealing.
Winners of the second round will be able to steal a player from the losing team, choosing one of their bench players.
winners of the third round can pick a starting player from either the team they beat from the second or third round, not both, just one player.
Given that it's not always clearly divided into starters/bench, you should say that after the 2nd round, you steal one of the loser's players who was drafted in rounds 5-8, and after the 3rd, it's rounds 1-4.@NUMBERICA @Wes Mantooth @White Chocolate @Ellis269 @Beer @David Hume @tfivas @Hekate @gandalfe @Troat Guru @Ron Mexico
I’ve finally come to my senses. The all time jazz draft is the perfect time and event to experiment with.
Rules for player stealing.
Winners of the second round will be able to steal a player from the losing team, choosing one of their bench players.
winners of the third round can pick a starting player from either the team they beat from the second or third round, not both, just one player.
Sure. Sounds goodGiven that it's not always clearly divided into starters/bench, you should say that after the 2nd round, you steal one of the loser's players who was drafted in rounds 5-8, and after the 3rd, it's rounds 1-4.
Shouldn’t round two be rounds 6-8 and third round 1-5?Given that it's not always clearly divided into starters/bench, you should say that after the 2nd round, you steal one of the loser's players who was drafted in rounds 5-8, and after the 3rd, it's rounds 1-4.
I’m pretty sure WC called me amateurish or something for wanting to change the game mid stream, but eh... what the hell he pissed me off pretty good, so let’s do it. There will be player stealing... winner can steal a bench player from the team they beat, then winners in third round will be able to steal a starter from either team they beat in the second or third round to give the two teams a better chance to get a player that fits their team best. If WC bitches about that he is forfeit.
Bout time you came to your senses.Dude you really need to get some help. I like the player stealing idea specifically for this draft.
I was thinking top half/bottom half, but you could split it there.Shouldn’t round two be rounds 6-8 and third round 1-5?
Two losers move on.I already lost idgaf
I want to make sure no one gets a difference maker. One or two teams could get a little more lucky then the rest. So, 6-8 after round 2. 1-5 after round 3.I was thinking top half/bottom half, but you could split it there.
I liked Spy's idea that ties are broken by draft order, where the person lower in the draft order wins the tiebreaker (I acknowledge that would most likely work to my benefit, but it is also super clean).I don't mind the stealing idea. Would be fun.
For ties. It has always been participant vote, if it's a tie again either sudden death or revote.
You steal one player from the team you beat. Not draft from a pool.So how would it work? The second round ends. We have four winners. How do we determine who, of those four teams, has first dibs at another player from a losing team’s roster?
I am fine as long it's clean. Participant vote should take priority though.I liked Spy's idea that ties are broken by draft order, where the person lower in the draft order wins the tiebreaker (I acknowledge that would most likely work to my benefit, but it is also super clean).