2020 NBA trade deadline discussion

[homeytennis]

What about Marvin Williams? He can stretch the floor.

 

[Jazz4ever]

I'm not saying the Jazz would do it, but LMA is a 7-ft big who can pick and pop, shoot 3s, grab 10 rebs, and block 1.5 shots. It's the one thing the Jazz don't have.

Seems to slow footed to be played with Gobert. Eventually are defensive rotations would get beat and lead to a lot of open corner 3s.

 

[SCS]

What about Marvin Williams? He can stretch the floor.

He makes 15 million this year. We aren't trading Clarkson or Ingles for him lol.

 

[jom2003]

i'm fine with trading Ed for one additional shooter. no backup center in this league can do what Rudy's done for us. not even close. put Ed on most of the teams in this league he'd still be a solid backup. but because we don't have any legit PF, our center is basically being asked to do the job of two. that's why i firmly believe this is Rudy's best season yet even though his defensive stats have gone down. we honestly need to give up defense entirely whenever rudy goes out and try to outscore our opponents with our elite 3 point shooting and ball movement. if lakers wanna size us up with AD, lebron and Mcgee/Dwight, good luck trading 2's for 3's.

 

[homeytennis]

He makes 15 million this year. We aren't trading Clarkson or Ingles for him lol.

Maybe he can be waived and we pick him up for the minimum.

 

[jom2003]

lol

i'd eat crows if he can keep this up. that's some davis bertans work he's been doing lately. just keep draining those 3s niang

 

[NUMBERICA]

Do we think that it's possible that we just trade Ed Davis for like a future second round pick? I'm not sure what team would be down to do that. The Jazz might be able to sell it as a situation where Davis just doesn't fit this particular team. We'd open a roster spot for a buyout target.

Not at all possible.

 

[NUMBERICA]

lol

Niang has been awesome. He was not awesome. Not sure what’s controversial about that.

 

[NAOS]

Niang has been awesome. He was not awesome. Not sure what’s controversial about that.

His struggles were vast exaggerated, though.

 

[NUMBERICA]

His struggles were vast exaggerated, though.

Exaggerated. His +/- was (and remains) brutal. Should not be guarding 3s which he was doing, also.

 

[jom2003]

Exaggerated. His +/- was (and remains) brutal. Should not be guarding 3s which he was doing, also.

we don't worry about defense when niang's on the floor. there's no point. just trading buckets.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Y'all acted like Niang wasnt a threat from 3 tho. It was just a wild opinion to have.