most of your post is about policy. In response to my post about character. There is a difference.
not really. Re-read the first paragraph
You can cherry pick bad things from any Prez.
Brown baby: that was amoral win at all costs play that played to the racists, I agree (I was a McCain supporter)
- Deceived into war? Your opinion. Did he lie or did he believed they had WMD? Pretty strong evidence that he believed it to be true.
- Torture? Sure, wrong, I agree, but his view was that he was doing it to destroy terrorism., so there was a moral tradeoff. My opinion, he was wrong, not amoral
- Kerry swift boat lies? Misleading and wrong, but on par for politics as usual
- Cultural fault lines as Trump? Terrible comparison. Trump is 1,000,000X worse.
- LGBT rights? Remember, Obama was against gay marriage. Could he have done better on policy? sure. Does this make him amoral? If so, Kennedy and Johnson were equally amorals
- Katrina indifference? your opinion. The optics were terrible, the response was terrible. You were not inside his head so have no basis to say he was indifferent to death and suffering, just your opinion.
I believe Bush is a decent human being who did his best but was an inept Prez. I doubt the Bush's and Obamas would be so close if Obama felt he was as morally deficient as you profess.
Lying about a political opponent fathering an illegitimate black baby, Torture for any reason, and deceiving a country into war isn't amoral. Like, that’s the very definition of immoral. There’s no moral case for torture. None.
You may have missed that I agreed about the brown baby thing.
And that I agree with you that torture is always wrong.
However, the morality of torture in extreme cases has been debated for centuries by ethicists and philosophers, so maybe it is not as black and white as you believe.
Your loved one is about to be killed and you have a person who has information to find her. What do you do, polite conversation? If you waterboard him and find your loved one, were you justified to do so?
Nuke somewhere in New York City will go off in an hour. You capture the perp. What do you do? Pretty please, with sugar on top?
I agree 100%We basically agree on torture, but I wanted to point out that torture is also very ineffective at getting accurate information. So even in these extreme situations, it's a poor choice even before you consider the morality.
You may have missed that I agreed about the brown baby thing.
And that I agree with you that torture is always wrong.
However, the morality of torture in extreme cases has been debated for centuries by ethicists and philosophers, so maybe it is not as black and white as you believe.
Your loved one is about to be killed and you have a person who has information to find her. What do you do, polite conversation? If you waterboard him and find your loved one, were you justified to do so?
Nuke somewhere in New York City will go off in an hour. You capture the perp. What do you do? Pretty please, with sugar on top?
So I at least found this interesting, discussion wise. Curious to other people's thoughts.
Based on current testimony, and Title IX, most likely both Joe Biden and Kavanaugh would have been kicked out of college. We have seen quite a few examples of this across the country, sometimes with people later being re-admitted.
Obviously Kavanaugh still kept his appointment, and it looks like Biden will keep his nomination.
So which response is the most correct?