What's new

2020 Presidential election

You two obviously have beef that colors each of your perceptions of the other.

Dutch didn't have a single post that wasn't unhinged unadulterated nonsense, Thriller's good post to bad post ratio is quite a bit better than that lol.

I agree. Thriller isnt whatever it is that Stoked thinks he is. He is fine. You dont have to read what he posts. Dutch did feel a little more like he was bombarding the forum with craziness.

Or maybe its just because he didnt use punctuation or proper grammer. So it stood out.
 
But it's totally OK to focus on Thriller in a conversation that ostensibly began with a GOP ad comparing AOC with the Khmer Rouge, featuring a burning photo fading to skulls.

I mean, I get it, you think he's the worst. But all you've done is distract the conversation away from that to something else, exactly what NPC wanted I imagine.

Lmfao, distract? Did people forget Trump is ****? That he and GOP leadership and careers need to be voted out?

No, they didn’t. 24/7 burns people out. It’ll be ok to discus this tangent.

If you don’t want to fine. But I still think what I think.
 
Haha cmon, no one spams like Heathme, he's the all time champ.

Wrong. He is literally the same. Go look at posts. Don’t take my work.

Heathme has him on screenshots. But tone, theme and post count? Nope
 
I agree. Thriller isnt whatever it is that Stoked thinks he is. He is fine. You dont have to read what he posts. Dutch did feel a little more like he was bombarding the forum with craziness.

Or maybe its just because he didnt use punctuation or proper grammer. So it stood out.

It’s possible I’m wrong on Thriller. I’ve openly asked, multiple times now. What. The. ****. What am I missing? History has shown me I’m probably wrong.

But to date no one has provided a single legit answer. Not one. So again.

What the hell am I missing?
 
Lmfao, distract? Did people forget Trump is ****? That he and GOP leadership and careers need to be voted out?

No, they didn’t. 24/7 burns people out. It’ll be ok to discus this tangent.

If you don’t want to fine. But I still think what I think.
The original post didn't have anything to do with Trump though?

I mean if you want to have other conversations about other things that's fine of course, but I don't think we need a post saying "but Thriller is also bad!" every time he posts a criticism of the GOP.
 
But it's totally OK to focus on Thriller in a conversation that ostensibly began with a GOP ad comparing AOC with the Khmer Rouge, featuring a burning photo fading to skulls.

I mean, I get it, you think he's the worst. But all you've done is distract the conversation away from that to something else, exactly what NPC wanted I imagine.

Why am I being mentioned here? Whoever you’re responding to I have on ignore and I’m not going to reveal their posts to read their crap. But it’s interesting that in response to a campaign slanderous attack ad against AOC shown on ABC, the person you’re arguing with has more of an issue with my posting than with the ad. Quite telling.
 
It’s possible I’m wrong on Thriller. I’ve openly asked, multiple times now. What. The. ****. What am I missing? History has shown me I’m probably wrong.

But to date no one has provided a single legit answer. Not one. So again.

What the hell am I missing?

I still dont get why people get so bent out of shape about the things they do on here.

Alot of people here just need to relax.
 
The original post didn't have anything to do with Trump though?

I mean if you want to have other conversations about other things that's fine of course, but I don't think we need a post saying "but Thriller is also bad!" every time he posts a criticism of the GOP.

Lol, until I’m shown legit arguments otherwise...

It’s not like I’m saying don’t be critical of the GOP. It’s poster specific.

Convince me.

Honest question.

If you saw what you considered “hate” that was posted constantly and went unchallenged would you speak up?
 
Back
Top