homeytennis
Well-Known Member
You are going to see after today a bunch of guys getting shredded by their teams. It's a bit fool hardy to speculate at the moment until we see who signs where and for what and what it does for teams' salary cap.
I'm not a big Gay guy. He's the right archetype, but he's not very good. Has never been a reliable shooter.
Nader isn’t good. What’s the infatuation with him?
I agree with you regarding Gay, unless he comes cheap and he won’t. But your last sentence should never be spoken or written because it might happen. My biggest fear this off-season is we overpay Niang, which to me is anything above the minimum.He shot the ball pretty well last season, but I don’t think he’s the archetype we need. What he’s really good at is getting to his shots in the midrange and scoring. Do we really need another iso scorer? No, I think that’s the last thing that we need.
Gay isn’t terrible as a defender/rebounder, but he’s 35 with tons of miles ok his body. Expecting him to do the dirty work (which is what we really need) seems like picking the wrong guy for the job.
I’d much rather pay Niang.
His TS% was 59.1% two years ago. 60.5% this year. He shot 37.5% from 3 two years ago. 41.9% this year. In 14.8 minutes per game this year, he grabbed 2.6 rebounds, and had 0.8 assists, 0.4 steals, and 0.4 blocks. Decent numbers. He has a 7’1” wingspan and positive advanced defensive metrics. For a cheap *** salary, name me a better player with that length, potential on the defensive end, who can hit the 3 and do some other things okay.
Kinda like how Jazz fans were furious Niang was on the court?Lolz he averaged 4.8 attempts a game. He got zero meaningful minutes in the playoffs. He’s just not good. Phoenix fans absolutely hate him. When Monty was playing him over Craig they were livid.
Lolz he averaged 4.8 attempts a game. He got zero meaningful minutes in the playoffs. He’s just not good. Phoenix fans absolutely hate him. When Monty was playing him over Craig they were livid.