You made a bad assumption about the rules that was not in the rules.
Seems like I’m not the only one.
You made a bad assumption about the rules that was not in the rules.
I'm still surprised Bill went as low as he did lol he's a rebounding/defensive juggernaut.Let’s be clear, Bill Russell where he was selected was terrific value even if there were no restrictions and @Elizah Huge has one of the best tandems in the contest. I would’ve selected him there if I was in his position regardless.
With serious offensive deficiencies (Gobert has much greater offensive impact and ability, as an example). Really should be paired with a player that can get their shot anytime they want and hit from anywhere on the court. So it’s a good pairing.I'm still surprised Bill went as low as he did lol he's a rebounding/defensive juggernaut.
Let’s be clear, Bill Russell where he was selected was terrific value even if there were no restrictions and @Elizah Huge has one of the best tandems in the contest. I would’ve selected him there if I was in his position regardless.
Let’s be clear, Bill Russell where he was selected was terrific value even if there were no restrictions and @Elizah Huge has one of the best tandems in the contest. I would’ve selected him there if I was in his position regardless (but couldn’t pass up the total package that KG brings).
I like the idea of a draft where there’s no trading of players. You can move your picks however you want to before you make a selection, but after you pick - that’s your guy. You live with the results.After this one is complete, I am down for another one with no rules on eras. Just beat all-time draft. If we wanted to change it up for once, we could say, no trading, or no trading of players.
Screw you. Nice pick.Pete Maravich 1976
@Thee Idiotic Minivan K OTC