Toddychurch selects Shawn Marion 05-06
The matrix. Wanted him. Hugely underrated.
Toddychurch selects Shawn Marion 05-06
You’ve had a great draft so far. That’s another really solid pick. The only one I didn’t really like was Yao.Tony Parker
2012-13
Isiah Thomas/Tony Parker
Paul George
Julius Erving
Chris Webber
Tim Duncan/Yao Ming
But no one wants to vote for a team with Kemp on it. Because reasons.
I think you misunderstood me. I drafted him like 3 times in a row in these things and those were some of the comments I got about not voting for my team, partly that Kemp was a bad pick. Kemp doesn't get votes on jazz fanz.Speak for yourself. Kemp was a stud. If he wasn't a head case would be all time great. Freak athlete. Great peak.
I feel he squandered his talent and didn’t get the most out of it, for some reason that kind of thing pisses me off.I think you misunderstood me. I drafted him like 3 times in a row in these things and those were some of the comments I got about not voting for my team, partly that Kemp was a bad pick. Kemp doesn't get votes on jazz fanz.
Then that isn't taking the intent or spirit of the draft into account. It's ignoring the season anyone might be choosing for their player to vote against them for wasting their talent rather than for what they brought that one year. Hence why I won't play. Doesn't matter the team you build or what they are capable of when the votes are "yeah he said that one thing about Stockton once so **** him."I feel he squandered his talent and didn’t get the most out of it, for some reason that kind of thing pisses me off.
Spill the beans, who got the meh teams?There are a lot of even teams. I don’t see many that are leaps and bounds above others. There are some pretty meh teams though.
2k22. I think we should vote first, then run the sim because I'm going to go fully in depth with it@The Fresh Prince which 2k sim are you using?
Does it have all the same stats and info back into the '60s?2k22. I think we should vote first, then run the sim because I'm going to go fully in depth with it