Yeah, Id say no chance. I see them taking Hendricks before Black.For a team that needs shooting more than anything else by a mile? Nah.
Yeah, Id say no chance. I see them taking Hendricks before Black.For a team that needs shooting more than anything else by a mile? Nah.
For a team that needs shooting more than anything else by a mile? Nah.
I mean other than the Sensabaugh to Utah thing, they were pretty in line with what the board concensus is. I think they feel like Sensabaugh has a Hardin-like ceiling and the Jazz need to reach for something like that here. It is like the guys considering GG at that spot.I listened to this today.
Wild how anyone can get a podcast.
To me the case against GG is that we already have Lauri. GG upside is probably scoring in a lot of the same ways as Lauri. So if you are looking at it from Danny's perspective does he want to develop a guy who has a reputation for being immature when he is somewhat redundant to your current star? Or would he rather use the picks to draft stars who could be primary ballhandlers or more "stars in their role" type players?
(And no, I'm not off GG Island, but I can see why Utah might not be enthralled)
Yeah, Id say no chance. I see them taking Hendricks before Black.
Of all the “low-upside” players in this draft that could pop, Podz is him.I would say Podziemski is the most Haliburton esque player.
Or they could take Grady at 9 and Wallace/Black at 11 (I think one of them is there at that spot).You do know they have 11 too right? They could easily take Black at 6 and Dick at 11.
the breadcrumb is Bilal is a prospect and Ainge is watching him play. of course the jazz are interested in him.Oh... this is a nice little breadcrumb... maybe?