I think I get it... I just don't agree with some of it. Wings that pass and create seem really rare... whereas guys that Black would be great next to seem abundant. Even if he isn't an "every down" creator I think he is very much a point guard.
I just think he could do his brand of point guard next to Trae, Kyrie, Donovan, Dame, Garland, Luka etc. A lot of those point guards would thrive next to a pass first point guard and his defense would cover up some holes. He'd also work well with Zach Lavine, Bradley Beal types... So I get that he isn't likely to be a volume scorer but I'd rather have that than what George would project to bring.
I look at it as he could be your point guard in a pass first organizer type of way... he could also thrive next to a pg, sg, wing that is a primary scorer and take some creation off their plate. I do think his passing is better than his assist numbers show... I've watched 5-6 games and am truly amazed at how little space there is or the 1-2 games he sets guys up with layups and the pass is bobbled.
I think there's just an oustanding question of, do you even want Anthony Black to create? He might not be good enough just like his shooting might not be good enough. That's the bigger question than what position you're calling him. For example, it really means absolutely nothing if you call Dyson Daniels the PG and CJ the SG if they play together. It matters what they do, and I think Black is closer to a PG who dribbles the ball up and stands in a corner than a PG who initiates and creates offense. A PG who does little creation is awfully similar to a Wing that does a little creation....and Black is in that category for me. When I bring up the question "is he even a PG?", I'm talking about the extent to which he can create offense. I don't think anyone really thinks that the question "Is he a PG" means "can he play next to Trae Young".