Wait until they hear about our guys having to pay tithing.
Poor NBA playersThe escrow comes back to him… not a tax.
A quick read tells me this is tax that some states (including CA) have where they tax opposing players. So AD will pay some tax here and some there, probably none of the jock tax actually to CA.Wouldnt "jock tax" not be a thing for most LA players? I'd assume if you play in CA you probably live in CA year round.
Oh yeah, completely forgot they factor in the tax in the states you play road games.A quick read tells me this is tax that some states (including CA) have where they tax opposing players. So AD will pay some tax here and some there, probably none of the jock tax actually to CA.
I agree it sounds weird. I do believe that you actually can do 1/82, though. That's how they calculate fines when players are suspended, at least.The whole idea of being taxed on visiting states doesn’t make any sense to me. Has that been confirmed? They’re paid a salary, not lump sums for each game. How would they even calculate how much they would owe for a game? You can’t even do 1/82 because their contract is 365/year that requires other duties that isn’t easily compartmentalism’s into 82 sections. Pilots and flight attendants don’t pay taxes in every state. People don’t pay another state’s tax because they have a business trip, or even frequent business trips, to a location.
The NBA can choose 1/82 for fines because they do that all internally and could divvy it up any way they wanted, really. But for taxation purposes it would be fairly arbitrary because the state doesn’t really have any way of determining what work happens and when. Saying 1/82 doesn’t really make much sense (from a state perspective) because it implies that the only work being done is the actual game.I agree it sounds weird. I do believe that you actually can do 1/82, though. That's how they calculate fines when players are suspended, at least.
Not sure how the states have specified this, but I guess if it's a minimum sum you earn working in the state, it's probably not entirely unreasonable.
I guess, good point. Apparently they do, though...The NBA can choose 1/82 for fines because they do that all internally and could divvy it up any way they wanted, really. But for taxation purposes it would be fairly arbitrary because the state doesn’t really have any way of determining what work happens and when. Saying 1/82 doesn’t really make much sense (from a state perspective) because it implies that the only work being done is the actual game.