Saw this being talked about in another thread so might as well make a thread just for the schedule:
View: https://x.com/andyblarsen/status/1824167074203308137
View: https://x.com/andyblarsen/status/1824167074203308137
Split the spurs games. Win at least one we shouldn't. Beat Chicago on the road? Portland on the road? Start somewhere between 5-18 and 7-16? Then we can start to get grimy or manage injuries. 20 games in is a good mark to tell the vets "sorry you will be sitting until the trade deadline as we are developing right now" TIA.From a first scan, I think the first part of the schedule is fairly difficult. Spurs at home we will probably be favored, but that might be it. When we do play the bad teams, it's all on the road. We don't play a bad team at home until January.
Split the spurs games. Win at least one we shouldn't. Beat Chicago on the road? Portland on the road? Start somewhere between 5-18 and 7-16? Then we can start to get grimy or manage injuries. 20 games in is a good mark to tell the vets "sorry you will be sitting until the trade deadline as we are developing right now" TIA.
Jack Nicholson nodding intensely gif goes hereFrom a first scan, I think the first part of the schedule is fairly difficult. Spurs at home we will probably be favored, but that might be it. When we do play the bad teams, it's all on the road. We don't play a bad team at home until January.
Split the spurs games. Win at least one we shouldn't. Beat Chicago on the road? Portland on the road? Start somewhere between 5-18 and 7-16? Then we can start to get grimy or manage injuries. 20 games in is a good mark to tell the vets "sorry you will be sitting until the trade deadline as we are developing right now" TIA.
From a tanking standpoint, this is really good news.From a first scan, I think the first part of the schedule is fairly difficult. Spurs at home we will probably be favored, but that might be it. When we do play the bad teams, it's all on the road. We don't play a bad team at home until January.
Last season 25 wins resulted in the 6th and 7th best lottery odds. That was in a year of a bad draft. This year's draft is projected to be one of the best: 25 wins can easily be a ticket to the 9th best odds.I have us at 18-30 at the trade deadline. We make a couple of tank trades at the deadline, sit Lauri and Kessler for a bunch of games and finish 7-27 for a final record of 25-57. That's probably good enough for 5th best lottery odds.
Last season 25 wins resulted in the 6th and 7th best lottery odds. That was in a year of a bad draft. This year's draft is projected to be one of the best: 25 wins can easily be a ticket to the 9th best odds.
That's not really how it works. The more teams that are tanking, the more wins are possible for the bad teams. In the Wemby draft, for example, 25 wins would have been the 4th best odds.
25 wins could certainly give us worse than 5th best odds, but I'm not sure there has ever been a draft where it resulted in the 9th best odds or worse.
I expect Charlotte to tank. They should anyway. They still dont have The Guy on that roster imo.25 wins leading to 9th best lottery odds has never happened (except for shortened seasons). Like you said, there also doesn't seem to be a correlation between draft strength and wins....adding to your Wemby draft example, the last draft that had this amount of hype was probably the 2014 draft. 25 wins would have also gotten you tied for 4th.
Having said that, I don't actually think the number of teams hardcore tanking is abnormally high or anything this year. In the West, it's really just us and Portland. In the East, many of these teams that are expected to be very bad might be in the play in race and they will have to play each other. I think what we will see are teams who you would expect to be in the playoff race quit early and become tankers.