Yeah, I approved the trade as I am about to take off and not looking at **** and then see that. Sorry theeThe thing that cracks me up is that Thee mentioned that he wanted ‘Melo, and then probably had a shot at him. . . but then @Domino swept in like a bird of prey and snatched him up before he could do anything about it.
The thing that cracks me up is that Thee mentioned that he wanted ‘Melo, and then probably had a shot at him. . . but then @Domino swept in like a bird of prey and snatched him up before he could do anything about it.
There’s no nice guys in running a draft. You’re either Danny Ainge, or you’re the mark. No in between.He took manu from me earlier in the draft after saying he wasn’t going to… I probably would’ve stayed put if he didn’t say anything
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
| Career highlights and awards |
|---|
|
No I told you I was eyeing him and may or may not pick him with that pick then I didn’t. Then you didn’t either then a couple picks later I did. LolThere’s no nice guys in running a draft. You’re either Danny Ainge, or you’re the mark. No in between.
I have a thought about that. I really like the concept of using the different eras and the strategy that goes into it, but I hate the early 2000’s. I think it’s the weakest one of all of them, and I rarely get a starting caliber player that I would draft in the first 5 rounds in this thing.Oh, I see. The draft has been kind of messy.
I have a thought about that. I really like the concept of using the different eras and the strategy that goes into it, but I hate the early 2000’s. I think it’s the weakest one of all of them, and I rarely get a starting caliber player that I would draft in the first 5 rounds in this thing.
I think this would be a lot better if we did one guy from ‘79 or earlier, one guy from the 80’s, one guy from the 90’s, one modern guy from 2000+, and then a free for all after the 4th pick. Same basic strategy, but a little less stringent and would open up a lot more if the draft, a lot earlier.
Just something to think about.
Yeah I’ve been doing these draft for 10+ years and found the restrictions in the past few years to be a lot less fun.I have a thought about that. I really like the concept of using the different eras and the strategy that goes into it, but I hate the early 2000’s. I think it’s the weakest one of all of them, and I rarely get a starting caliber player that I would draft in the first 5 rounds in this thing.
I think this would be a lot better if we did one guy from ‘79 or earlier, one guy from the 80’s, one guy from the 90’s, one modern guy from 2000+, and then a free for all after the 4th pick. Same basic strategy, but a little less stringent and would open up a lot more if the draft, a lot earlier.
Just something to think about.
I would propose first 5 picks has to be x3 from pre 2000, and x2 from post 2000.I have a thought about that. I really like the concept of using the different eras and the strategy that goes into it, but I hate the early 2000’s. I think it’s the weakest one of all of them, and I rarely get a starting caliber player that I would draft in the first 5 rounds in this thing.
I think this would be a lot better if we did one guy from ‘79 or earlier, one guy from the 80’s, one guy from the 90’s, one modern guy from 2000+, and then a free for all after the 4th pick. Same basic strategy, but a little less stringent and would open up a lot more if the draft, a lot earlier.
Just something to think about.
That’s an interesting one. I also like the idea of drafting anyone you want, whenever you want - but you can only have a maximum of three guys from any one era on your roster at any given time during the draft.I would propose first 5 picks has to be x3 from pre 2000, and x2 from post 2000.
That would make it a lot more fun imo.