What's new
By:

2024 NBA Draft Mega Thread

Saint Cy of JFC said:
If he wanted Dillingham in Utah, he would workout for Utah, not a report that Utah was interested and didnt get a workout.
Click to expand...
That’s not the way I took the report. He has workouts scheduled in Detroit and San Antonio and Utah expressed interest in getting a workout. There are still 7 days until the draft and he was injured.
 
Elizah Huge said:
That’s not the way I took the report. He has workouts scheduled in Detroit and San Antonio and Utah expressed interest in getting a workout. There are still 7 days until the draft and he was injured.
Click to expand...
So Utah has expressed interest and they havent bothered to schedule it because they are too busy? Sounds like Utah got denied.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I think we’re more likely to trade up to secure someone like Williams (can’t believe I’m saying this Ferg) than taking Carter or Walter at 10.
Click to expand...

There's so much uncertainty with picks 6 - 9 potentially being on the market, that I find it unlikely the Jazz will passively sit at #10, unless they're satisfied with Holland, Edey, Topic or someone like Walter. They can't even be assured that Knecht or Carter will be there at 10. In other words, I think they'll try to move up for *someone*. I think the Jazz will be willing to move their picks in this draft and one of several players to get someone they love. They just need to feel strongly enough about that player.
 
Ferguson_Mellochill said:
There's so much uncertainty with picks 6 - 9 potentially being on the market, that I find it unlikely the Jazz will passively sit at #10, unless they're satisfied with Holland, Edey, Topic or someone like Walter. They can't even be assured that Knecht or Carter will be there at 10. In other words, I think they'll try to move up for *someone*. I think the Jazz will be willing to move their picks in this draft and one of several players to get someone they love. They just need to feel strongly enough about that player.
Click to expand...

I for one would be absolutely ecstatic to get Holland at #10.

I think we're overthinking him a bit.

He has all the attributes to become Anthony Edwards lite to me. (I don't think Edwards was known to have a good 3 pointer neither did he?)

If he's there at #10 I'm grabbing him with both arms.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Is there any concern that Sarr/Dillingham were both very mediocre OTE players compared to the Thompson twins and what that means for their future?

I feel like the answer is probably a no just because of how little we know about OTE and what/who translates out of it, but it is interesting.
Click to expand...

Dillingham, no. He was super productive at the NCAA level and that's more relevant.

Sarr...yeah it's a little sus. He played well in AUS but also few minutes.
 
DX and Bleacher Report both have Shannon around 25ish. Will be interesting to see if that sticks. I think he would be a great get at #22 if we trade up with the Suns.
 
KqWIN said:
DX and Bleacher Report both have Shannon around 25ish. Will be interesting to see if that sticks. I think he would be a great get at #22 if we trade up with the Suns.
Click to expand...

Knicks have put 24 and 25 on the market. They've also been linked to Clarkson in the past. Just putting that out there.
 
KqWIN said:
Dillingham, no. He was super productive at the NCAA level and that's more relevant.

Sarr...yeah it's a little sus. He played well in AUS but also few minutes.
Click to expand...

With Sarr, you're mostly drafting him as a versatile defensive presence, I think. The offensive development is a big question mark.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top