What's new
By:

2024 NBA Draft Mega Thread

Elizah Huge said:
I’m sorry but I’m not passing on someone because we like a top-5 prospect in next years draft better lol. We wouldn’t be able to draft anyone with that logic.
Click to expand...
Especially if we indeed are going big game hunting in the off-season and we want to improve the team in the immediate. We might not even be close to top 5 pick next year.
 
stitches said:
He's been dominating Sarr since they were in primary school. No guarantee it translates to the NBA, but just some food for thought. And yet another sign about the quality of this draft.
Click to expand...
I would say it's more of a negative for Sarr than a positive for Almanza
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I haven't really been a big fan of taking Dilly or Topic for us... but at 10 you kinda take what is there. Castle was never getting past 6 imo. I would move up to 3-5 if the price is okay (not giving up any 2025 picks but a 2027 pick maybe... I just think 2025 is lining up to be an amazing draft potentially).

Topic I just haven't been able to get a feel for... Dilly I think I understand his floor and ceiling. I know fit shouldn't be the number 1 concern but man the fit with Key, Sexton, Dilly or Topic gets wonky. I wish Topic was a better shooter or slightly better defender... I just hate having two potential red flags like that... and if the knee isn't right it can really throw off the development of the player early. I would understand either guy as the pick but Topic makes me nervous.

I know some are saying in a bad draft swing for the fences (cuz in 2013 that worked I guess) but I almost wonder if taking the high floor guy who projects more as a solid starter type is the smarter play for us before starting to lock in to something positionally. I know you and I both share similar thoughts on the high floor guy being actually high ceiling too... but I wonder if Carter is a better idea than Dilly or Topic for roster building... seems like a more fungible guard that can help the Superstar (if we ever get him).
Click to expand...

With the roster we have and picking at #10, I think by far and away the biggest concern is getting the guy who we think is the best player. No positional or fit concerns for me at all. I could see a world where you believe Sexton is good enough to start changing your decision making, but I don't think we live in a world where the FO feels that way.

Now, you could say Dilly/Topic is a worse player/prospect because of his fit with any team in the NBA. I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that. I've soured on Dilly/Topic a bit, I'm not sure they are a better pick than the theoretical long wings (Holland/Williams/Salaun), the older guys (Carter/Knecht), or even some of the other wildcard picks like Collier/Walter. Out of this group, I think Dilly/Topic probably have the highest chance of getting a "hit". I wouldn't mind taking them, but I don't feels strongly over the rest of the pack.
 
Topic continues too look super goofy to me with the way he moves... not even sure this should be any sort of consideration... I just can't shake that off when I watch him.
 
stitches said:
He's been dominating Sarr since they were in primary school. No guarantee it translates to the NBA, but just some food for thought. And yet another sign about the quality of this draft.
Click to expand...

One thing you can be confident about Gleague Ignite last year: No one was setting up bigs, or moving the ball in any consistent or coherent way.
 
KqWIN said:
With the roster we have and picking at #10, I think by far and away the biggest concern is getting the guy who we think is the best player. No positional or fit concerns for me at all. I could see a world where you believe Sexton is good enough to start changing your decision making, but I don't think we live in a world where the FO feels that way.

Now, you could say Dilly/Topic is a worse player/prospect because of his fit with any team in the NBA. I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that. I've soured on Dilly/Topic a bit, I'm not sure they are a better pick than the theoretical long wings (Holland/Williams/Salaun), the older guys (Carter/Knecht), or even some of the other wildcard picks like Collier/Walter. Out of this group, I think Dilly/Topic probably have the highest chance of getting a "hit". I wouldn't mind taking them, but I don't feels strongly over the rest of the pack.
Click to expand...
I'm probably not explaining myself well enough... but agree with your thoughts here.

Maybe to put it differently... lets say player X has a 5% at being an all-star in your evaluation but a 10% at being a starter quality player and 85% at being a scrub. Player Y has a 2% chance at being a star 40% at being a starter and 58% at being a scrub. It seems like everyone is like "you have to take Player X as he has a higher chance at being a star... that's what happened in 2013". I'm just not sure that is what I want to do... and I know there are like a bunch more in between outcomes that factor in too.
 
stitches said:
Topic continues too look super goofy to me with the way he moves... not even sure this should be any sort of consideration... I just can't shake that off when I watch him.
Click to expand...
I am ignorant with regard to non-US leagues. So I don't know if his ability to create and score at the rim is partially bullying smaller dudes and weaker competition... being mid in the bigger league with a small sample is my concern. I think I buy into some star upside potential there but I'm not sure its a bet I'd make.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I am ignorant with regard to non-US leagues. So I don't know if his ability to create and score at the rim is partially bullying smaller dudes and weaker competition... being mid in the bigger league with a small sample is my concern. I think I buy into some star upside potential there but I'm not sure its a bet I'd make.
Click to expand...
First it's the same league. Both Mega and Zvezda play in the same league. The difference is he was the big fish in the small pond with Mega and he was a youngster on a team of vets with Zvezda. The other difference is - I think most of his time at Zvezda was after his injury. I don't think he looked fully recovered when he came back and then he got injured again. Also - keep in mind that we are talking about really small samples. Like... he has 36 shots for Zvezda... TOTAL, in all games. If he scores 3 more buckets it would bumps his FG by 9-10%. His AST% and RB% and stocks largely held up across teams.
 
stitches said:
First it's the same league. Both Mega and Zvezda play in the same league. The difference is he was the big fish in the small pond with Mega and he was a youngster on a team of vets with Zvezda. The other difference is - I think most of his time at Zvezda was after his injury. I don't think he looked fully recovered when he came back and then he got injured again. Also - keep in mind that we are talking about really small samples. Like... he has 36 shots for Zvezda... TOTAL, in all games. If he scores 3 more buckets it would bumps his FG by 9-10%. His AST% and RB% and stocks largely held up across teams.
Click to expand...
Thank you... I misunderstood why the move was a big deal. Thought it may have been a JV Varsity type of thing. I probably take him if he's there at 10 enough to like and if he is there its likely because nba teams overreacted to the medicals on his knee.
 
Just to add, if there is difference in quality of competition - it's between the local league and the Euroleague and there he took just 8 shots and made 3.
 
Also... integrating another rookie pg type would be a fantastic way to lose so many games. Team tank wins big there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top