i don't think he said garland is a ceiling. rather garland is just an example of scoring guard of similar size to dillingham, that has been successful. garland has been a 20 ppg scorer - i see dillingham's ceiling as a scorer in that trae young range - 25-30 ppg.You keep bringing up Darius Garland like that is a good thing. If you think Dillingham is the most likely to be a star and his ceiling is Garland then this is a terrible draft. I really don't see the thought process. Can you give me a player that is comparable that ever helped a team really compete? Short, score first guard, with no defense. Even if there is couple, it is extremely rare.
If I was running the show, I’d probably be drafting him to flip him down the line (if I couldn’t find a clean path to relegating him as a sixth man and if it’s just clear as day that anyone else at that slot has no ceiling or has low odds of sticking at all).You keep bringing up Darius Garland like that is a good thing. If you think Dillingham is the most likely to be a star and his ceiling is Garland then this is a terrible draft. I really don't see the thought process. Can you give me a player that is comparable that ever helped a team really compete? Short, score first guard, with no defense. Even if there is couple, it is extremely rare.
If you get a Garland caliber of player with the 10th pick in the draft then you hit a ****ing homerun. Some of you are overthinking this ****.You keep bringing up Darius Garland like that is a good thing. If you think Dillingham is the most likely to be a star and his ceiling is Garland then this is a terrible draft. I really don't see the thought process. Can you give me a player that is comparable that ever helped a team really compete? Short, score first guard, with no defense. Even if there is couple, it is extremely rare.
I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree. I never want a short, score first guard, with no defense, on the Jazz ever again.If you get a Garland caliber of player with the 10th pick in the draft then you hit a ****ing homerun. Some of you are overthinking this ****.
Darius Garland is an all-star player. At pick 10 you can’t ask for much more than that.You keep bringing up Darius Garland like that is a good thing. If you think Dillingham is the most likely to be a star and his ceiling is Garland then this is a terrible draft. I really don't see the thought process. Can you give me a player that is comparable that ever helped a team really compete? Short, score first guard, with no defense. Even if there is couple, it is extremely rare.
So essentially we need to purge our entire guard group then from Sexton to Keyonte.I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree. I never want a short, score first guard, with no defense, on the Jazz ever again.
Maybe I'm overthinking this.....
I wonder if there are actually less trades for this draft than would be expected because A) teams feel like the talent is flat and B) they have less of an idea of what other teams are doing, i.e. they can't predict the draft and so there is higher risk of trading back and having your guy taken.
It depends on if you want to win or you just enjoy watching the player. Since I want to win, then yes I would purge the them or at least as starters. While I know it is extremely hard to do, I want to target players like Boston. I want Jrue and White type players.So essentially we need to purge our entire guard group then from Sexton to Keyonte.
If he is a 30+ minute a night guy he might need to be there. I do think in some ways he might offer some versatility offensively that Trae doesn't if he will go offball a bit more than Trae. He may end up more as a 20-25 minute a night guy that comes off the bench.Tony Jones thinks Dillingham needs to reach Trae Young levels of offensive production to offset how awful his defense is.