LIstened to the Hoop Collective podcast on the way to work today. First of all there was a difference of opinion on whether the Pacers will try to go for 10 and they wanted clarification on who wanted the 10-30 protections. Then McMahon emphatically said that this was not the same package that was offered to Utah, which I thought was clarifying. In other words someone from the Utah front office specifically told him that they did not get the same offer for Kessler, or in other words Utah's front office wanted it out there that they didn't pass on that deal, or in other words it's very possible that Utah would have taken that deal for Kessler.
The main distinction they made was that Zubac is cost controlled, or in other words Indiana was concerned about how much they were going to have to pay Kessler
But we don’t know if the Kessler package was better or worse though right?