25% left of obamas 8 year EVIL reign!!!!!

[trigg3r]

My dream candidacy for 2016 for the two major awful parties in this country is Hillary vs. Jeb.

If that's not enough to get a credible 3rd Party candidate running, nothing will be.

It won't matter. Idiots will still vote party line. The new royal families(Clinton's and Bush's) will do battle for the future of the country while the old royal family(Kennedy's) sits back and prepares itself for its next chance at power in years to come.

 

[Deleted member 365]

My dream candidacy for 2016 for the two major awful parties in this country is Hillary vs. Jeb.

If that's not enough to get a credible 3rd Party candidate running, nothing will be.

There's more to it than this.

Money talks. Typically, the candidate with the most money, wins.

So while poor 3rd party people bitch about how awful it is that people aren't sold on their awesomeness, the Koch bros are pumping millions into republican candidates across the nation.

Don't think that's fair? Bitch to the Supreme Court. Citizens United and the other court case this year declared bribery a form of free speech.

Want a 3rd party candidate to win? How much do you really want he/she to win? Cuz you're gonna have to pay if you're gonna play in this game.

Until the USA enacts campaign finance reform and/or publicly funded elections, your 2 party elections involving millions of dollars being thrown around will continue.

 

[trigg3r]

There's more to it than this.

Money talks. Typically, the candidate with the most money, wins.

So while poor 3rd party people bitch about how awful it is that people aren't sold on their awesomeness, the Koch bros are pumping millions into republican candidates across the nation.

Don't think that's fair? Bitch to the Supreme Court. Citizens United and the other court case this year declared bribery a form of free speech.

Want a 3rd party candidate to win? How much do you really want he/she to win? Cuz you're gonna have to pay if you're gonna play in this game.

Until the USA enacts campaign finance reform and/or publicly funded elections, your 2 party elections involving millions of dollars being thrown around will continue.

And George Soros isn't doing that for the DNC? Give me a break. At least acknowledge that this happens on both sides.

 

[Deleted member 365]

It won't matter. Idiots will still vote party line. The new royal families(Clinton's and Bush's) will do battle for the future of the country while the old royal family(Kennedy's) sits back and prepares itself for its next chance at power in years to come.

It's not "idiots" but the idiotic system.

A Democratic system, zero transparency in campaign bribery errr donations, and a few billionaires. Gee, what could go wrong here?

 

[Deleted member 365]

And George Soros isn't doing that for the DNC? Give me a break. At least acknowledge that this happens on both sides.

I don't know. Is he? How much did he donate in 2014? What are the names of his propaganda "think tanks"?

Since Obama actually out funded Romney, of course this bribery happens on "both sides."

So what's your point? Bribery is ok as long as it's for your team?

Pretty sure my post on publicly financed elections sorta reveals how I stand on bribery.

 

[trigg3r]

I don't know. Is he? How much did he donate in 2014? What are the names of his propaganda "think tanks"?

Since Obama actually out funded Romney, of course this bribery happens on "both sides."

So what's your point? Bribery is ok as long as it's for your team?

Pretty sure my post on publicly financed elections sorta reveals how I stand on bribery.

My point is pretty simple to see. Both sides do this and yet you single out the Koch brother(because it supports your hate everything GOP narrative) and yet you completely ignored Soros and the millions he has given to the DNC to get candidates elected. You have a history of only seeing things from the left side of the spectrum. Your post about the Koch brothers is just more of the same. Yes, it happens on both sides as you said. Let's not just call out one contributor. George Soros is just as destructive to the political process as the Koch brothers are.

 

[Deleted member 365]

My point is pretty simple to see. Both sides do this and yet you single out the Koch brother(because it supports your hate everything GOP narrative) and yet you completely ignored Soros and the millions he has given to the DNC to get candidates elected. You have a history of only seeing things from the left side of the spectrum. Your post about the Koch brothers is just more of the same. Yes, it happens on both sides as you said. Let's not just call out one contributor. George Soros is just as destructive to the political process as the Koch brothers are.

Last chance, what did George Soros do in 2012?

Could you name me his "think tanks"?

Remember, if he's just as bad as the Kochs, then this shouldn't be too hard for you to report.

 

[trigg3r]

Last chance, what did George Soros do in 2012?

Could you name me his "think tanks"?

Remember, if he's just as bad as the Kochs, then this shouldn't be too hard for you to report.

So because he decided to not donate heavily in the 2012 election it means he is better than the Koch brothers? How much did he donate in 2008? You know what, you aren't worth it. You're stuck in your ideology and wasting my time. Being a political hack has to get old, right? I'll do you the favor of putting you on ignore since you gave me that last chance and all. Goodbye.

 

[gandalfe]

Bush went to Yale and Harvard…

While he didn't get the best grades, he was and is, an intelligent man.

His speaking certainly wasn't the best in the world, but at least he knew how many states we have.

I always said he wasn't as dumb as we gave him credit for. His father was VERY smart.

Our smartest presidents, post WWII, in terms of sheer wrinkly brain power, have ben Obama, Clinton, Carter, and Nixon. And everyone of them had a severely troubled presidency, in part because they were just (or thought they were) too smart for the rest of us.

 

[gandalfe]

The Koch brothers are rich enough to make Soros their butler. They own the second largest corporation in the country. There's really no comparison. The Kochs have donated about $200 million to right wing causes and political advocacy, while Soros has donated more in the neighborhood of $50 million, maybe, being generous about how you count things.

https://billmoyers.com/2014/04/10/nothing-really-compares-to-the-koch-brothers-political-empire/

Besides, you're just using a tu quoque fallacy.

 

[DutchJazzer]

I always said he wasn't as dumb as we gave him credit for. His father was VERY smart.

Our smartest presidents, post WWII, in terms of sheer wrinkly brain power, have ben Obama, Clinton, Carter, and Nixon. And everyone of them had a severely troubled presidency, in part because they were just (or thought they were) too smart for the rest of us.

obama is the dumbesty president ever.
he only one because he is a joke.
he makes people laugh and he is black.

he is a RETARD

 

[Revolution 9]

Dutch hates him. That pretty much cements it. He's the best ever.