What's new
By:

7 more games for Hayward & Ty....

Sexual Favors said:
I'm w/ b_line. If the FA market had ANYTHING out there for US that was of equal value to Hayward, then maybe I'd understand using our cap on that. With the way our books are laid out, keeping Hayward at almost ANY price is a non factor since it will come off the books by the time the 2014 draftees come off their rookie scale. Hayward's a good #3 guy.


Maybe you all forgot that we are rebuilding and their would be pain? Did you expect him to just step into the #1 option (which he isn't built for) w/o any experienced/or not over-the-hill vets to help ease him in, and be awesome, while also leading us to the draft position we wanted so we could get his counterpart?

Some of you just can't help but bitch about everything.
Click to expand...

I like Lance Stephenson. That is all.

Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
Jazzfan0124 said:
No...one of them. You said both would stay.
Click to expand...

Ok. Ten dollars to be transfered through our baseball league in some way.

If you can name which one, I'll give another five if you are right. If you aren't then you pay 5.

So basically two different bets if you want. Or we can just do the bet that both stay for ten.
 
Hack said:
Ok. Ten dollars to be transfered the our baseball league in some way.

If you can name which one, I'll give another five if you are right. If you aren't then you pay 5.

So basically two different bets if you want. Or we can just do the bet that both stay for ten.
Click to expand...
Both will not stay. $10 bet. Deal.
 
b_line said:
If we get the number two pick and don't keep Hayward, we are pretty stupid.

Imagine a new young coach with a team of Burke, burks, Hayward, kanter, favors and a second pick rookie. We would be awesome next year, let alone three years from now when we win the championship.
Click to expand...

It depends on who's available. If we pick 2nd it's most likely a choice between Parker and Embiid. Hayward has proven he can't really play the 2. Our best lineups have Burks playing the 2 and Hayward playing the 3. Parker is just a better version of Hayward and I would rather see Burks play next to him than Hayward. If we took Embiid then we keep him.
 
heyhey said:
It depends on who's available. If we pick 2nd it's most likely a choice between Parker and Embiid. Hayward has proven he can't really play the 2. Our best lineups have Burks playing the 2 and Hayward playing the 3. Parker is just a better version of Hayward and I would rather see Burks play next to him than Hayward. If we took Embiid then we keep him.
Click to expand...

I would still rather have a three wing rotation of Parker, Hayward and burks than a rotation of Parker, burks and a lesser player than Hayward. In my mind, there is no way the jazz let Hayward get away, and there is no reason to let him go, because a championship team needs to be a deep team, and Hayward is a perfect glue player. He can do a lot of things well, and scoring off the ball is one of those things. I think Hayward would do exceptionally well with Parker on this team.
 
b_line said:
I would still rather have a three wing rotation of Parker, Hayward and burks than a rotation of Parker, burks and a lesser player than Hayward. In my mind, there is no way the jazz let Hayward get away, and there is no reason to let him go, because a championship team needs to be a deep team, and Hayward is a perfect glue player. He can do a lot of things well, and scoring off the ball is one of those things. I think Hayward would do exceptionally well with Parker on this team.
Click to expand...

I just think Hayward would be too expensive to make it worth it to bring him off the bench. Trade him and spread the talent around(if we pick Parker). We would probably win in a trade involving Hayward. I like him a lot but I think his value is over inflated around the league.
 
So basically you all think Hayward will be offered 12 mil from Portland, and the Jazz will not match.

Got it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top