What's new

A Mitt Romney and Condoleeza Rice ticket?

OK. As I said before this tangent, your words still seemed soaked in privilege to me.

Maybe we can go back to you making a connection between the New Black Panther Patry and racism on the left?

The extent of that connection is that the New Black Panther Party is rascist. They are clearly closer in ideology to the Democrat party then they are the Republican party. That is the extent of the connection.

They are not the cause of rascism any more than any other rascist group is. Simply a left leaning rascist group. That's it.
 
What part of their ideology is closer to the Democratic party than the Republican?

Keep in mind that this party is very far left. Farther then the general liberal population. Their disdain for capitalism and their desire for "communal wealth" Clearly that is not a conservative ideology.

I am currently not in a position to supply the proof of this. I can latter tonight if you wish or you can simply google them and find all you need to know.

The NBPP (New Black Panther Party) does not represent the left by any means but they are obviously not a right leaning organization.
 
Keep in mind that this party is very far left. Farther then the general liberal population. Their disdain for capitalism and their desire for "communal wealth" Clearly that is not a conservative ideology.

It is, however, a facist ideology, and fascism is as much on the right end of the political scale as on the left.
 
Hence the liberal outrage over Barack Obama. Great point.

Well, maybe you're having some fun with me, but that's OK. My beef with Obama doesn't center on his family life. His "success" is what I'd focus on. A community organizer cultivating relations with all sorts of politically-active extremists isn't what I call "financial success". It's the ties with Chicago establishment politicos that I think gave him the "usefulness" to some interests, and got him the little rocket to "success". He is not his own man, but utterly servile and dependent on . . . . . . um . . . . . others . . . . . that I deplore.

I see a critical difference between Obama and a certain black buddy I used to talk to a lot on the way to work and back. My buddy had actual ideals and actual principles, even if he was truly a marxist. Nobody could have "used" him.

But I can also see some "progressives" being very frustrated with Obama, for not doing well enough for them. I am so far thanking Obama for dragging his feet and not getting us into another war, and for actually bringing some of our troopes home like he promised.

I am also very impressed with some of his decisions in regard to more "local" issues, like promoting more competition in the Ag sector, to the dismay of some cartelists.
 
Well, maybe you're having some fun with me, but that's OK. My beef with Obama doesn't center on his family life. His "success" is what I'd focus on. A community organizer cultivating relations with all sorts of politically-active extremists isn't what I call "financial success".

He's worth in the neighborhood of $10 million. Fromn what I recall, he had very little family money to work with. You don't think that is financial success?
 
Well, maybe you're having some fun with me, but that's OK. My beef with Obama doesn't center on his family life. His "success" is what I'd focus on. A community organizer cultivating relations with all sorts of politically-active extremists isn't what I call "financial success". It's the ties with Chicago establishment politicos that I think gave him the "usefulness" to some interests, and got him the little rocket to "success". He is not his own man, but utterly servile and dependent on . . . . . . um . . . . . others . . . . . that I deplore.

I see a critical difference between Obama and a certain black buddy I used to talk to a lot on the way to work and back. My buddy had actual ideals and actual principles, even if he was truly a marxist. Nobody could have "used" him.

But I can also see some "progressives" being very frustrated with Obama, for not doing well enough for them. I am so far thanking Obama for dragging his feet and not getting us into another war, and for actually bringing some of our troopes home like he promised.

I am also very impressed with some of his decisions in regard to more "local" issues, like promoting more competition in the Ag sector, to the dismay of some cartelists.

Somehow I expected to the words "marxist" and "progressive" to end up in the same post here. Not too astonishing.
 
This news anchor is asking Wasserman-Schults (DNC chair) if a long Republican nomination process is good for Republicans. She uses that to just bash them. I love how in American politics nobody will ever say anything nice about the other side.
 
This news anchor is asking Wasserman-Schults (DNC chair) if a long Republican nomination process is good for Republicans. She uses that to just bash them. I love how in American politics nobody will ever say anything nice about the other side.

Debbie Downer is just like any other politician. That's the problem with this country. For the love of god or whatever you believe in or don't believe in..... Term limits need to be established to get rid of career politicians like Debbie Downer, Mitch McConnell, Orrin Hatch, Nancy Pelosi and the bunch.
 
Debbie Downer is just like any other politician. That's the problem with this country. For the love of god or whatever you believe in or don't believe in..... Term limits need to be established to get rid of career politicians like Debbie Downer, Mitch McConnell, Orrin Hatch, Nancy Pelosi and the bunch.

That and do away with the lifetime pension and healthcare they get. Two terms and go back to private life and get a job.
 
Back
Top