What's new

Alex Jones and Social Media Censorship

Be specific.
I'm not going to hold your hand on something you can easily do. Click play on the video you posted and listen away.

In fact, I recommend listening to the whole podcast and the one with Andy Ngo.

One quick example I will give you is Carlos Maza (Mr Victim of Steven Crowder) inciting violence and influencing Andy Ngo getting his *** kicked to the point of brain hemorrhaging.
 
I'm not going to hold your hand on something you can easily do. Click play on the video you posted and listen away.

In fact, I recommend listening to the whole podcast and the one with Andy Ngo.

One quick example I will give you is Carlos Maza (Mr Victim of Steven Crowder) inciting violence and influencing Andy Ngo getting his *** kicked to the point of brain hemorrhaging.

I guess that's as specific as I can expect from you.

Conservative Crowder used racial slurs, and otherwise hurtful speech on YouTube, which is against their rules(which are clear as day), but Youtube gave Crowder a free pass to break the rules.

Andy Ngo seems to have been assaulted, and at least three people have been arrested with an ongoing investigation

So in your examples, you've successfully cited a conservative getting away with breaking the rules, and three possible antifa members that have been arrested and an investigation into more.

Is that right?
 
I guess that's as specific as I can expect from you.

Conservative Crowder used racial slurs, and otherwise hurtful speech on YouTube, which is against their rules(which are clear as day), but Youtube gave Crowder a free pass to break the rules.

Andy Ngo seems to have been assaulted, and at least three people have been arrested with an ongoing investigation

So in your examples, you've successfully cited a conservative getting away with breaking the rules, and three possible antifa members that have been arrested and an investigation into more.

Is that right?

Your reading comprehension is beyond ******.
It makes responding to you almost impossible.
 
Wtf does people being arrested have to do with Carlos Maza's tweet where he encouraged and incited violence?

Your whole point revolves around proud boys and conservatives being treated unfairly. They're not. They're white, privileged assholes are afraid of no longer being quite as privileged. Crowder was demonetized, after he kept toeing over the line. Milkshakes were being thrown before Maza said anything. Concrete? Doesn't seem to be any evidence to support that. I don't think he's asked for concrete milkshakes.

People being arrested is a way of paying for crimes. You allege, and continue to allege, one side is treated more favorably. In the case of Andy Ngo, that's just not true. **** happened, it shouldn't have, and those that committed crimes were arrested, and will pay for it.
 
While we're near the subject of persecution, let's discuss the White Genocide Conspiracy Theory, which is what I was referring to when I said the roots of proud boys some time back.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_genocide_conspiracy_theory

In 1916, the American eugenicist and lawyer Madison Grant wrote a book entitled The Passing of the Great Race which, while largely ignored when it first appeared, went through four editions, becoming part of popular culture in 1920s America and, in the process, spawned the ideology that the founding-stock of the United States, the so-called Nordic race, were under extinction threats from assimiliation with non-whites. Grant wrote of it:

Neither the black, nor the brown, nor the yellow, nor the red will conquer the white in battle. But if the valuable elements in the Nordic race mix with inferior strains or die out through race suicide, then the citadel of civilization will fall for mere lack of defenders.

The theory goes back well before Gavin logged into breitbart, and is cousin to Aryan beliefs. White Supremacy, of course, goes back even further.
 
I would challenge anybody here to Michael Isakoff’s podcast on Seth rich and how Alex Jones exploited this tragedy and then explain why he shouldn’t be banned from most/all public forums. His family, just like those who listen friends and loved ones in Sandy Hook, shouldn’t be terrorized because some lazy fat *** loudmouth can make a quick buck spewing paranoia and vitriol.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/conspiracyland/id1471037693?i=1000444030784
 
Your whole point revolves around proud boys being treated unfairly. They're not. They're white, privileged assholes are afraid of no longer being quite as privileged.

Your reading comprehension and inability to understand what I'm saying is beyond poor. I literally just told you what my point is and then you translated it into meaning something you think. When did I say anything about the proud boys being treated unfairly? I didn't yet you have to use this narrative to protect your bias and larpers called the antifa.

It's useless having a conversation with you. You can't read. You translate things into what you want them to mean. You bring up invalid counter arguments e.g. there have been arrests and you lie about it
People being arrested is a way of paying for crimes. You allege, and continue to allege, one side is treated more favorably. In the case of Andy Ngo, that's just not true. **** happened, it shouldn't have, and those that committed crimes were arrested, and will pay for it.

Why lie about it, man? Is it because you can't read worth ****? Only read headlines? Or forget to add context to spin your narrative?
No. One. Was. Arrested. For. Beating. Ngo.
The three arrests were not connected to the Ngo attack, according to the Tribune. Police are investigating the Ngo attack, however.

Dry cement or not, telling your Twitter followers to milkshake people is a call to violence and against Twitter's policy.


Again, here's my point and no, it's not that I think the Proud Boys are mistreated. Again, a bitch move for putting those words in my mouth because you can't read.
**** the proud boys. **** the antifa.

The point being made is not to sympathize for either group. It's to shut them both down if you're going to use rules.

Like Tim Pool says, if you're going to ban the Proud Boys, then by all means. Using the same standards, why not ban the antifa? The Twitter lawyer even agrees with it. It's a simple point being made. It, by no means, translates to white knighting. Shut down any groups that incites violence.
 
Your reading comprehension and inability to understand what I'm saying is beyond poor. I literally just told you what my point is and then you translated it into meaning something you think. When did I say anything about the proud boys being treated unfairly? I didn't yet you have to use this narrative to protect your bias and larpers called the antifa.

It's useless having a conversation with you. You can't read. You translate things into what you want them to mean. You bring up invalid counter arguments e.g. there have been arrests and you lie about it


Why lie about it, man? Is it because you can't read worth ****? Only read headlines? Or forget to add context to spin your narrative?
No. One. Was. Arrested. For. Beating. Ngo.


Dry cement or not, telling your Twitter followers to milkshake people is a call to violence and against Twitter's policy.


Again, here's my point and no, it's not that I think the Proud Boys are mistreated. Again, a bitch move for putting those words in my mouth because you can't read.

You can talk all you want man, but you're out of credits. Your actions posting speaks for yourself; Antifa does something wrong, bitch and moan. proud boys and conservatives get somehow disadvantaged(fiction or non); raise hell.

But when a nazi ran someone over, or proud boys showed up armed for a standoff, keeping guns and staff a rooftop over, you were silent.

People around here largely shut the **** up about extremists because they don't want to give them credibility. You on the other hand were happy to support your boys, and cry foul at the drop of a hat.
 
The more I think about it, you're the worst kind of racist. The one that thinks he's not, tries to prove he's not, speaks for his side and his interests, and says **** the rest.

And yes, as of now, I AM calling you racist.
 
Back
Top