What's new
By:

Am I racist?

fishonjazz said:
Anyone want to answer this question or make a comment about the existence of positive stereotypes?
Click to expand...

It's because that discussion came to a pretty interesting conclusion, and you haven't bothered to read it. If you did, you probably wouldn't be asking this question.
 
dalamon said:
It's because that discussion came to a pretty interesting conclusion, and you haven't bothered to read it. If you did, you probably wouldn't be asking this question.
Click to expand...
The discussion of positive stereotypes?

Who has talked about that? Enlighten me
 
dalamon said:
Dude, you just simply do not get it. I'd try, but I know many have before me.
Click to expand...
****** is not a racial slur?
Wonder why it is censored
 
dalamon said:
talk about whether stereotypes are memes, or created with purpose to stigmatize.
Click to expand...
Quote some posts in this thread for me of posters discussing positive stereotypes.
I have read this thread and saw bad asian drivers, cheap jews and dutch people, drunk indians, etc etc
What ones of those are positive to the people they are stereotyping?
 
fishonjazz said:
Quote some posts in this thread for me of posters discussing positive stereotypes.
I have read this thread and saw bad asian drivers, cheap jews and dutch people, drunk indians, etc etc
What ones of those are positive to the people they are stereotyping?
Click to expand...

bro
1) I aint quoting **** for you. Go read it yourself.
2) I said the nature of stereotyping was concluded-- this encompasses positive stereotyping. I'm not gonna walk you through every post.
 
dalamon said:
where did I say ****** wasn't a slur?
Click to expand...
Well someone had said that they can't believe that an Indian would not get offended by the word redskin because it's a racial slur as if it's not possible for a person of the race that the slur is about to not be offended.

I responded by saying that I'm not offended by the word ******, which is a racial slur, and I am in fact a white dude.

So obviously it's possible for people to not be offended by a racial slur
 
Siro said:
You're simply wrong about the word Indian. It is very commonly used within the Native American community. I've only heard white liberals say that the term is offensive.

https://web.archive.org/web/2007080...ies/highlights/2006/bismarck/fts_hour3_4.html

Edit: I'm not saying that only liberals say it. But that it is a liberal cause, and not strongly a Native American one.
Click to expand...


Here's what I've found after 20 seconds on google:
Indian

The term "Indian" refers to the legal identity of a First Nations person who is registered under the Indian Act. The term "Indian" should be used only when referring to a First Nations person with status under the Indian Act, and only within its legal context. Aside from this specific legal context, the term "Indian" in Canada is considered outdated and may be considered offensive due to its complex and often idiosyncratic colonial use in governing identity through this legislation and a myriad of other distinctions (i.e., "treaty" and "non-treaty," etc.). In the United States, however, the term "American Indian" and "Native Indian" are both in current and common usage.

You may also hear some First Nations people refer to themselves as "Indians." While there are many reasons for an individual to self-identify as such, this may be a deliberate act on their part to position and present themselves as someone who is defined by federal legislation.

"Indian Band" is also a legal term under the Indian Act to denote a grouping of status Indians. (For more information on this, see our section on bands.)
Click to expand...

https://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/home/identity/terminology.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top