What's new
By:

Andy Larsen is on point

Handlogten's Heros said:
There is zero tradeoff to trading for Torrey Craig instead of Matt Thomas from a salary perspective... it would have netted a guy that would be in the rotation and useful... another team with more ample talent on the wing went ahead and got him... all it cost was $117k... no picks.

We didn't have the salary for PJ Tucker, but I think every contending team made an addition that has proved useful. We thumbed our damn holes.
Click to expand...

I got laughed out of a thread I started for suggesting we trade for Tucker. He is washed according to JazzFanz.
 
White Chocolate said:
I got laughed out of a thread I started for suggesting we trade for Tucker. He is washed according to JazzFanz.
Click to expand...
So were Batum and Blake... its almost like when vets get in ****** situations they stop trying. Its pretty predictable.
 
White Chocolate said:
I got laughed out of a thread I started for suggesting we trade for Tucker. He is washed according to JazzFanz.
Click to expand...
Well if I was critical of the idea, I probably said something about how the Jazz have no assets, are capped out, and would have nothing to send to match salary that the Jazz would be willing to part with and that they would want.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Well if I was critical of the idea, I probably said something about how the Jazz have no assets, are capped out, and would have nothing to send to match salary that the Jazz would be willing to part with and that they would want.
Click to expand...

Which was valid but two different things. Saying he was washed was the sentiment and that he isn’t guarding anyone elite. Come to find out he’s guarding Durant pretty damn well. We could certainly use him right now. We could have him as a small ball 5 when Rudy goes to the bench or at PF and take turns on Kawhi/George with Royce.
 
White Chocolate said:
Which was valid but two different things. Saying he was washed was the sentiment and that he isn’t guarding anyone elite. Come to find out he’s guarding Durant pretty damn well. We could certainly use him right now. We could have him as a small ball 5 when Rudy goes to the bench or at PF and take turns on Kawhi/George with Royce.
Click to expand...
He is vastly preferable to Favors and Niang, and he would've been able to replace both of them (with some modifications to the rotation). In other words; word. Would've been nice.
 
White Chocolate said:
Which was valid but two different things. Saying he was washed was the sentiment and that he isn’t guarding anyone elite. Come to find out he’s guarding Durant pretty damn well. We could certainly use him right now. We could have him as a small ball 5 when Rudy goes to the bench or at PF and take turns on Kawhi/George with Royce.
Click to expand...
I thought that was why we got Ersan?
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Shaq Harrison was an awful point guard, but he would've been preferable on defense to Oni and most anyone we have on the bench.
Click to expand...
He's a wing who can handle the ball a little. I realize what he is listed at and how we used him... it was dumb. Shaq is better than Oni.
 
Not getting Tucker is fine because at that point we literally couldn't match contracts. Not getting Torrey Craig when he was free was malpractice. I don't have those ancestor tracking things but I bet if you had Matt Thomas take one, we would find that he is related to DL in some form or fashion... its the only explanation.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Not getting Tucker is fine because at that point we literally couldn't match contracts. Not getting Torrey Craig when he was free was malpractice. I don't have those ancestor tracking things but I bet if you had Matt Thomas take one, we would find that he is related to DL in some form or fashion... its the only explanation.
Click to expand...

Favors for Tucker works salary wise just saying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top