Another GOOD reason to dump Klinko!

[//r00t 4 Jazz]

Also wanted to add over the last couple of years their wives had become friendly and hung out even in the off season, so doubt there is any animosity between them.

 

[NCJazz]

I "care". I know a lot of people believe he is done here, but I'm not so sure. I still see a (small) chance of him re-singing in Utah. I am NOT saying I want this, but I see it as possible, so i still follow AK news. I just heard on the radio today that he said he wants to be in Utah or NJ. Didn't him and d-will more or less hate each other? Just seems weird to me that he would want to go to NJ........or we can talk about his tattoo some more, you pick.

Agree. Playing very well in Russia. Our wing position is not very good right now. If we amnesty Bell we would have a big need for a wing and also if we trade Millsap, AK can play some at 4. Obviously the down side is we can not expect him to play 66 games or 82 in the future. I do believe AK had a little to much Vodka on the day he decided to get that tatoo.

 

[NCJazz]

Okay .. just sayin' that IF AK wanted to go to NJ, good riddance. I suspect, though, the talk of NJ is mostly the Russian connection, maybe?

A good amount of it is. However NJ may also amnesty Outlaw so SF would be a need for them. Have quite a bit of money to spend, but sounds like they will go after a superstar first like Howard to try to keep DWill.

 

[LogGrad98]

2 problems with AK:

1) He will want, and command, way more than he is worth. Plenty of NBA teams desperate and unknowing will see his play in Russia, think that is who he "really" is and offer him upwards of $8 to $10 million per for 3 or 4 years. He is not worth that amount of money. Period.

2) He does not come through. AK is the coitus interruptus of the NBA.

And another point, he would suck time away from our more promising players. If we drop evans and move CJ and/or Sap or someone else for a PG or something then there is a spot for him, and we can get him on the cheap (less than the MLE) then I say ok, but otherwise, let him walk.

 

[JAZZFAN_2814]

I hate tattoos too, but it's a personal choice, and if you refuse to allow people to make their own choices, then you're a bigot, but I guess everyone, including yourself, already knows that.

And it's his choice to hate Kirilenko and his back tattoo, bigot.

I love liberal thought: diversity is a strength. We must tolerate all lifestyles.

Unless, of course, there's something the current "progressive" fascism is against. Then the "hate" must be stopped and, of course, state-controlled.

There's diversity, and then there's "diversity". The latter is beneath self-realization/thought, and perhaps parody.

Your world suggests that even a difference of opinion shouldn't be allowed. Always the victim, as a crowning achievement and clowning syllogism, eh, write4u?

 

[carolinajazz]

I do believe AK had a little to much Vodka on the day he decided to get that tatoo.

...sounds like your old school....when only DRUNK sailors or other inebriated people would end up with tattoo's! I use to ask guys I would run into standing in line at stores: "Exactly how DRUNK were you when you got that tattoo?" Most of them would say "Pretty drunk!" Of course, now a days a comment or question like that could get me capped! By the way, I can't figure out how some on this board continue to accuse me of being KKK when NO KKK members are anti-tattoo like I am! In fact, almost all KKK's are tattooed themselves!

 

[Jazz Spazz]

...sounds like your old school....when only DRUNK sailors or other inebriated people would end up with tattoo's! I use to ask guys I would run into standing in line at stores: "Exactly how DRUNK were you when you got that tattoo?" Most of them would say "Pretty drunk!" Of course, now a days a comment or question like that could get me capped! By the way, I can't figure out how some on this board continue to accuse me of being KKK when NO KKK members are anti-tattoo like I am! In fact, almost all KKK's are tattooed themselves!

So you admit you know almost all KKK's?

 

[carolinajazz]

And it's his choice to hate Kirilenko and his back tattoo, bigot.

....don't necessarily hate Klinko but certainly think he's been drastically overpaid other than his first couple of years with the Jazz. Now, I do hate and despise what he has done to his back with that disgusting tattoo! Thanks for your support, though, for my cause of dignity and decency.

 

[carolinajazz]

So you admit you know almost all KKK's?

....can't say I've ever talked with one or seen one in person. Only on T.V. or movies...like "Mississippi Burning." Which, by the way, I was pulling for the Fed's all the way!

 

[m3at]

And it's his choice to hate Kirilenko and his back tattoo...

It's not possible for cj to hate ak, ak is white.

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

And it's his choice to hate Kirilenko and his back tattoo, bigot.

I love liberal thought: diversity is a strength. We must tolerate all lifestyles.

Unless, of course, there's something the current "progressive" fascism is against. Then the "hate" must be stopped and, of course, state-controlled.

There's diversity, and then there's "diversity". The latter is beneath self-realization/thought, and perhaps parody.

Your world suggests that even a difference of opinion shouldn't be allowed. Always the victim, as a crowning achievement and clowning syllogism, eh, write4u?

Tolerance for diversity is not and was never about respecting stupid people or stupid ideas. Color of someone's skin--irrelevant. Nature of someone's sexual preference--irrelevant. Personal religions belief--irrelevant (to the extent he/she doesn't foist it on others or use it as pretext to say and do dumb and bigoted things). Content of someone's beliefs/ideas--Fair game. CJ has consistently advocated backward, intolerant, bigoted ideas. Sorry, he and his silly beliefs are fair game. Tolerance has nothing to do with it.