I guess we get to find out if the funnel to Rudy defensive structure was better than attempting to get all 5 to play defense without a Rudy in the middle. Did Rudy being so good make the others worse? I'm curious. Of course it's hard to gauge because Quin is gone too so I won't know if it's that or if it's the new scheme brought in by Doogie Howser.
unfortunately, even without rudy this team is good enough to win about 35-40 games.
yup it's the worst case scenario.
I feel like I hear this at least every other year.
and maybe the best SG prospect since Wade.
Yeah but unfortunately this current roster is just not built to play defense without Rudy. Not sure the acquisition of Vanderbilt and Beverly is enough to change that
Bogey was part of a 21 win Brooklyn team that wasn't even trying to tank(Celtics owned their pick) Conley led Memphis to a 33win season. JC bounced around from one bad team to another before finding his home here. And apparently this DM kid is so bad at basketball that jazz fans want him gone. Rudy is one of the main reasons for us to be anywhere near the playoffs picture.
Can you guys at least give some names?
I'd say we have a worse talented & less balanced roster than a lot of tanking teams. These teams actually had to shut down their starters in order to lose enough games. Why would they do that if they aren’t talented enough to put up 30-40wins.
