So you are saying that the potential for injury didn't exist then? It most certainly did. If he had more minutes that year would it have reared its ugly head? I think he was lucky he didn't suffer a major injury that year. Maybe his low minutes were a blessing that allowed him to play a few more years before a major injury derailed his career. Either way, taking into account the player that he actually did become is valid as to whether or not you would want him at his rookie year performance again over someone we have now. If it is simply in a vacuum then the right question would be who had a better rookie year, D Will or Trey. Then it is a simple stats comparison. But if you are asking would I rather have D Will in his rookies year or Trey in his, well along with that comes the presumption that we then would have each for a few years. We already know what we had with D Will and where he ended up. If we are engaging in conjecture, well in this case I would take the devil we don't know and go with Burke, knowing full well that D Will in the end will be reduced to a shadow of his former self by nagging injuries.
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}