LoPo
Well-Known Member
Jesus you are dense sometimes... not all the times but holy ****. Lakers are good in transition... when you turn the ball over a **** ton of times like we did it leads to many transition opportunities.
AD did not get where he wanted in half court... Davis scored some on three pointers... threes he gets any night he wants.. he just made 50% of them instead of 34%. AD did not back down Rudy either... he shot face up jumpers that mostly missed. He got out in transition... he hit some three pointers (off of passes from other guys). I promise you that AD's point paints were primarily off of transition... not because he got wherever he wanted. He tried forcing the issue in the first quarter and went 6-14 with a turnover.
Let's just say that AD goes 3/8 from three... still above his average... and lets just say JC hits 3/9 from three... below his average... we make up that 8 point gap right there. Its a make or miss league... they made enough shots... we did not. It is really that simples sometimes. Rudy, DM and others did their jobs but it just wasn't enough to carry the guys that sucked.
I'm sorry you aren't impressed with how hard Rudy works to get those 6 opportunities and that you can't see most of those were contested or alley oops we went up and got over multiple athletic giant defenders. If we were hitting any three pointer maybe people wouldn't pack the paint so hard and he could get a couple more.
Say whatever you want to say - Rudy didn't protect the paint and his guy scored 40+. He didn't have a great game. He wasn't the reason we stayed in the game. Mitchell played out of his mind in the first half, Royce guarded everybody and Conley had a good game. Rudy was average. He's not the reason we lost. He's also not a reason we could have won.