What's new
By:

Game Thread Aug 07, 2020: Utah Jazz vs San Antonio Spurs

Added to Calendar: 08-07-20

I'm sorry but I really don't see what others here see in Morgan. He's not an NBA player and under no circumstances should he be ahead of Brantley on the depth chart. I'd rather have Brantley at both 5 and 4 than Morgan.
 
NAOS said:
Bradley has played himself into the rotation, but I still feel like if Morgan had been given the same number of reps, then he’d be a better and more useful player right now.
Click to expand...
Right after I say this, Morgan badly misses a rotation.
 
NAOS said:
Bradley has played himself into the rotation, but I still feel like if Morgan had been given the same number of reps, then he’d be a better and more useful player right now.
Click to expand...
I'm a little torn. I am not a Bradley fan, but he has a knack for offensive rebounds and can provide a reliable pick and roll finisher. His screens aren't great... he barely makes contact most times. His defense has improved and he's had some BBIQ improvements (it couldn't have gotten much worse).

I think Morgan can be the switchy 5 that shoots. He gets his hands on a lot a balls and moves really well. I think he could be more useful too, but TB has played well enough to keep the job this season. It also is tough to evaluate Tony on defense in our scheme and when he shares the floor with Niang, JC, etc. he ain't getting any help.
 
stitches said:
I'm sorry but I really don't see what others here see in Morgan. He's not an NBA player and under no circumstances should he be ahead of Brantley on the depth chart. I'd rather have Brantley at both 5 and 4 than Morgan.
Click to expand...

He is used as a 4 and it isn't where he can find success imo. He is stuck in the corner on offense.

On defense the tools are his hands and his feet. If he can hold up as a 5 size wise he'd give us a solid Pop option as a 5 and could work really well in a switch scheme. Watch when he defends perimeter guys and watch how many times he gets his hands on the ball.

I agree though... I think Brantley has a much better ceiling and can be thrown out there in a few different scenarios. He should be the guy we play next to Tony... Niang should grab some bench.
 
prodigy said:
Click to expand...

that's pretty promising... Most promising thing for the coach will be that he did his homework. Under on the screen and didn't bite on the pump fake.

COACH... he read the scouting report... He has physical tools... PLEASE PLAY THE GUY!
 
Troat Guru said:
And what about Tucker?
I'm personally not impressed at all by him
Click to expand...
He seems like the guy who does well in the G League on volume. I get why they have him. He seems to be more in control. I really like his explanation to Andy Larsen on why he didn't shoot the threes. I wouldn't play him over Brantley or Oni... If we didn't have Clarkson then maybe he'd be more of an asset breaking the paint and such.

He's a worthy prospect and I think he has a little ******* to him... that is something I like. He makes more sense than NWG... if that guy is on the roster next year I will throw a fit.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
I have never understood the Oni Love on jazzfanz, never!!
Click to expand...
Because any guy with his physical tools that can shoot can be a major asset as a role player. He's shown promise as a shooter... He's slow laterally but I think he can improve a bit. He could be a Royce type player. Has some ball handling and passing promise that is intriguing.

I ain't saying hes the best thing since sliced bread buy he's a good prospect... especially where we got him.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Because any guy with his physical tools that can shoot can be a major asset as a role player. He's shown promise as a shooter... He's slow laterally but I think he can improve a bit. He could be a Royce type player. Has some ball handling and passing promise that is intriguing.

I ain't saying hes the best thing since sliced bread buy he's a good prospect... especially where we got him.
Click to expand...
Oni is slow laterally? Not what I see (on defense, that is).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top