What's new

Ben Shapiro

I'm still flabbergasted that you're not capable to understand I was making a point about reading into things. Smh. Again.

Yes, and I'm telling you it was a very ****ty one.

Burn again. Please, stop.

The irony of this anti-PC climate is the fact that conservative white people are 100% some of the softest, most sensitive people I've ever met.
 
Yes, and I'm telling you it was a very ****ty one.



The irony of this anti-PC climate is the fact that conservative white people are 100% some of the softest, most sensitive people I've ever met.

It was ****ty because I did the same damn exact thing you guys did? If I didn't, please, explain the difference.
The irony, Dalamon. You guys have been butt hurt in this thread for things and view points that are non-existent.
 
It was ****ty because I did the same damn exact thing you guys did? If I didn't, please, explain the difference.

I already did. Piece it together with your reading comp.

The irony, Dalamon. You guys have been butt hurt in this thread for things and view points that are non-existent.

We don't take you seriously, and laugh at your vague support of a vile human being.
 
Sigh. Evidently I'm a Ben Shapiro's biggest supporter, I'm going to his speech and the woodshed, and if I make a hyperbolic and false assumption to get the point across to stop making false assumptions, it's a ****ty example.
Good bye, Jazzfanz. :)
 
Archie, seriously, participate in some of the more light-hearted threads. The times you've come around lately you're pushing divisive ideas and then leaving again. I could swallow some of what you're trying to say a little easier if you had a presence here and demonstrated your humorous side (I think you've got a great sense of humor) and more of your human side. I know you're a long time poster and we all know you, but you haven't posted much at all lately except in heavily charged threads where you're taking an unpopular stand.
 
I listened to the entire CSULA speech. There wasn't much to it. He wasn't blatantly racist in that speech. People are ultimately responsible for their own actions and their own outcomes, but that doesn't mean that everyone has the same path to successful outcomes. Many people he might hold up as examples of the right way to be wouldn't be good examples if they faced significantly greater challenges every step of the way there. Many would have failed and he would blame them for not being good enough.

I agree with him that not all diversity is created equally and diversity for the sake of diversity is pretty worthless. But inclusion builds a sense of belonging and ownership amongst populations that have been intentionally excluded for success for generations. That's not just good for those populations, that's good for us privileged folks as well.

And keeping people out of the country because they fit a profile? Yeah, I'm not on board with that.
 
I already did. Piece it together with your reading comp.



We don't take you seriously, and laugh at your vague support of a vile human being.

You've done this to a lot of posters where you act like they said stuff they haven't said.
 
Back
Top