One thing you do not see is who the competition is. Often these single game stats are inflated if that group is playing against a 2nd unit, or if Conley and Lauri were primarily facing the starters it will pull their numbers down a bit. But my bet is they weren't net negatives.
It is not that difficult to see what they are doing. It is however clearly not easy to defend an unselfish roster and that is the difference so far. However I will say I am starting to see a little bit of selfishness on occasion from players who are prone to it pre-Jazz.
And 8 days later now he's one of the better +/- players and apart of a lot of the best lineups.
Why are you so concerned with being right or wrong.
Dont think I said anything about me being right or wrong, just that it's funny that people made an entire thread to **** on him, but when it stopped being a useful tool to do so they abandoned it.
Many of us have been acknowledging his improvement in other threads. Doesn't change the past you know. He still sucked at that time. Now he's gotten better and we're happy about that. Are you the guy that gets pissed at politicians who get new info so they change their position based on that new info, you know like adults do from time to time, but now they're "flip-floppers" so they need to be cancelled?
Also, Vando and Lauri have zero fit. No surprise there as you don't have to guard Vanderbilt, allowing the opposition to put more big/wing resources into neutralizing Markkanen in various ways. Plus neither of these guys is a rim protector.
why don't you have to guard vanderbilt?
