DutchJazzer
Banned
More anti-Al stuff. The guy had more points than Duncan and Parker combined, btw.
but his defeatist loser attitude affected the whole team
More anti-Al stuff. The guy had more points than Duncan and Parker combined, btw.
We shouldn't even care about the Ultimate prize I'm happy with a 10 handicap and hitting from the women's tee.
Glaring weakness....shooting and playmakers. Players that can knock down open 3s and players that make other players better on the ct
In my opinion, here is why we lost in the series... The Spurs are a horrible match up for the Jazz. Harris couldn't catch Parker with a motor cycle. Big Al has no clue on the pic'n roll defense. Millsap couldn't get a clean shot against Boris Diaw. Hayward couldn't throw it in the ocean. The Jazz just can't shoot well from outside. Our starting small forward for the last month hardly played. Our coach doesn't seem to make the obvious move.
First round series grades:
Harris: C
Hayward: D
Burks: C
Tinsley: C
Howard: D
Millsap: C
Kanter: C
Favors: B+
Jefferson: C
Ty: D-
That is way to lenient on Big Al in my opinion. Give Big Al a D and tell him to like that it isn't worse. I'd maybe give Harris a C+
I've seen a lot of answers all of which could be understood as true but for me, it's team defense.
Was Al individually awful? Yes, but so was Harris in slipping through screens and keeping Parker from penetrating. So were our bigs at making Parker pay when he did penetrate. So were others and not just Al at rotating both down low for help and out to the wings. I mean, how many open threes did the Spurs have? About four or five per game.
Team defense is the answer for me. Had we done all the little things right, take better angles, rotate quicker, and so forth, we'd have still lost, sure, but we'd have limited so many of the easy baskets the Spurs got. We'd have turned some of that good defense into easier (transition) offense (where we too struggled), much like we saw in the 4th quarter last night. If we played better team defense, we'd have had less 14-20 point deficits, and more 8-12 point ones that felt like they were manageable.
Team defense.
I figured Al got an F on defense and a B- on offense and a C+ on rebounding. I figured a lenient overall C.
But we hired Sidney Lowe, right? The same guy that couldn't keep a job at NC State .. or make the NCAA tourney. He's our guy on defense.
/smugassedness
But we hired Sidney Lowe, right? The same guy that couldn't keep a job at NC State .. or make the NCAA tourney. He's our guy on defense.
/smugassedness
I've seen a lot of answers all of which could be understood as true but for me, it's team defense.
Was Al individually awful? Yes, but so was Harris in slipping through screens and keeping Parker from penetrating. So were our bigs at making Parker pay when he did penetrate. So were others and not just Al at rotating both down low for help and out to the wings. I mean, how many open threes did the Spurs have? About four or five per game.
Team defense is the answer for me. Had we done all the little things right, take better angles, rotate quicker, and so forth, we'd have still lost, sure, but we'd have limited so many of the easy baskets the Spurs got. We'd have turned some of that good defense into easier (transition) offense (where we too struggled), much like we saw in the 4th quarter last night. If we played better team defense, we'd have had less 14-20 point deficits, and more 8-12 point ones that felt like they were manageable.
Team defense.