What's new
By:

**Breaking** Trey Burke being discussed in Trades!!!!

Diamond77 said:
Hopefully DL has learned the lesson with Kanter's trade and decided to trade Burke now!
Click to expand...

Agreed. He's done well to rehab his trade value as a bench scorer, but I just don't see him as a long-term fit. Better to get something while he's still well regarded and on a good contract, than to hang onto him until the relationship sours and the best they can get for him is peanuts and addition by subtraction.
 
Totally hypothetical and made up, but would any of you trade Burke to Houston for Lawson and a 1st round pick?
 
kabenac said:
Totally hypothetical and made up, but would any of you trade Burke to Houston for Lawson and a 1st round pick?
Click to expand...

No. Lawson is toxic and his non-guaranteed contract has more value than he does. Jazz don't need to get rid of Burke to create cap space, so they should look to add something of quantitative value if they're trading him. I'm fine if they go bigger for Burke, but I don't see Lawson as the right fit.
 
By holding Kanter and everything else can stay constant and time go on returns diminish. I learn this from greatest finance school all of Bulgaria!
 
I remember last year I wait for my great Heor Kanter to be trade and hope yield ugh return and even think when I hear it what the???I remember for one second I can get a little excite when I hear Lamb, but then it comes out... I hope this time we can have some good trade and make us more stable for short and long term!
 
ThaPhunkPhenomenon said:
Cost can be sunk only because Jazz let it DUH!
Click to expand...

Cost was sunk because he didn't work out. He was a bad investment with the 3rd pick. But he sabotaged his value demanding a trade. However the Jazz got more than fair value considering OKC is now paying a backup big like a starter. So as I always said getting anything for him was a win, because the Jazz had no interest in having him on the roster, we were losing him for nothing if they waited.
 
gregbroncs said:
Cost was sunk because he didn't work out. He was a bad investment with the 3rd pick. But he sabotaged his value demanding a trade. However the Jazz got more than fair value considering OKC is now paying a backup big like a starter. So as I always said getting anything for him was a win, because the Jazz had no interest in having on the roster, we were losing him for nothing if they waited.
Click to expand...

We should
1> Never take him. I knew it!
2> Trade him for Harden!
3> Trade him before last year Trade deadline!

We wait. know we pat ourself and say oh well "sunk cost" Sunk cost means bad choice!
 
ThaPhunkPhenomenon said:
We should
1> Never take him. I knew it!
2> Trade him for Harden!
3> Trade him before last year Trade deadline!

We wait. know we pat ourself and say oh well "sunk cost" Sunk cost means bad choice!
Click to expand...

Good god how is this so hard to understand. Yes he was a bad 3rd pick the cost was lost as soon as you make that choice. Never in any universe was Kanter going to get you Harden. They traded him when they had to, you have no idea if anybody offered more prior to that trade. If you trade him earlier you may get more, or you may not. His value was never that high for any of his stint here.
 
gregbroncs said:
Good god how is this so hard to understand. Yes he was a bad 3rd pick the cost was lost as soon as you make that choice. Never in any universe was Kanter going to get you Harden. They traded him when they had to, you have no idea if anybody offered more prior to that trade. If you trade him earlier you may get more, or you may not. His value was never that high for any of his stint here.
Click to expand...

You don't know what you can even SAY! It is on record OKC offer Harden for Kanter and filler. Don't yell me guy!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top