What's new

**Breaking** Trey Burke being discussed in Trades!!!!

Dont contracts have to match to within a certain degree?

Not if the trade still works for us under the cap I don't think. But if does have to be, I think it's 125%, maybe 130%.

If we keep Booker, then Pleiss, Burke and two 2nds for Hill and Whittington?
 
Dont contracts have to match to within a certain degree?

This has mostly been touched on, but you don't have to match incoming salaries if one team is under the cap. Once at the cap, teams can only take back 150% of what is sent out. In other words, Booker would only be useful salary in a trade if the Jazz are taking in more than $17 million in salary.
 
We better not move Burke for anyone less than good scorer. Trey's been a huge part of us hovering around .500 during the injuries.
 
the way you know that Burke aint worthless is due to the number of teams going after him.

Only way Burke becomes expendable is based on the development of Neto. If Neto becomes a damn good playmaker, then he & Exum might work as the 1-2 punch, forcing Burke out of the rotation (pending we keep Burks).
 
Back
Top