What's new
By:

Bridges to knicks

Coach Ellis said:
Tbh - I’d rather keep Lauri. Jazz have a unicorn in the prime of his career and it seems like so many fans want to try to cash in. I get it, but I’d rather build around him. Opportunities are going to come available and the Jazz are suited to take advantage of just about anything right now.
Click to expand...

I agree.
 
fishonjazz said:
I'm down

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Me too tbh. We’re tanking next year anyway. So yet another wasted Lauri year. And we’re probably not even going to be playoff ready the year after. So maybe 3 years from now we’ll be a playoff contender? How much longer is Lauri’s contract for?
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Kind of cool they reunited the Nova guys. Team is now super interesting if they keep OG and Hartenstein

I know everyone loves Thibs, but I'd be seriously worried about this team ever making it to a postseason in good shape. They might go for 60 wins next season and have nothing left come playoff time.

Really hope we see the full version of this team in the playoffs at some point.
Click to expand...
They also really deep though and lots of dudes need minutes. I bet dudes don't play as much as people think they will

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
The Nets couldn't pair Bridges with someone else after trying so they got tired of trying to attract guys to follow Mikal and they cashed in.

If we can't pair someone with Lauri NOW then we are in the same spot as Brooklyn was... aka middling capital of the world.

it hasnt mde any sense the last two years... and it wont make any sense the next 2.

NY just set the market. Its time to cash in and completely reset.
 
fishonjazz said:
They also really deep though and lots of dudes need minutes. I bet dudes don't play as much as people think they will

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It’s a Thibbs coached team. Their bench will be starting come mid season because all the starters will be out with injury.
 
The Jazz Wonderbra said:
The Nets couldn't pair Bridges with someone else after trying so they got tired of trying to attract guys to follow Mikal and they cashed in.

If we can't pair someone with Lauri NOW then we are in the same spot as Brooklyn was... aka middling capital of the world.

it hasnt mde any sense the last two years... and it wont make any sense the next 2.

NY just set the market. Its time to cash in and completely reset.
Click to expand...
I think this is right.

Sadly, keeping Lauri just doesn’t make sense to me anymore. If we’re trying to tank and rebuild then let’s do it right. Instead, we’re just holding onto an asset that will only diminish in value the longer we hold onto it. I’d love to see a Lauri led team do stuff in the playoffs but I just don’t see how we can build fast enough around him to make retaining him over the next 3-4 years make any sense.
 
The Thriller said:
I think this is right.

Sadly, keeping Lauri just doesn’t make sense to me anymore. If we’re trying to tank and rebuild then let’s do it right. Instead, we’re just holding onto an asset that will only diminish in value the longer we hold onto it. I’d love to see a Lauri led team do stuff in the playoffs but I just don’t see how we can build fast enough around him to make retaining him over the next 3-4 years make any sense.
Click to expand...
It makes a ton of sense unless you get a Bridges offer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top